School of Nursing, Federal University of Rio Grande, 96201-900 Rio Grande, RS, Brazil.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012 Jul;9(7):2362-77. doi: 10.3390/ijerph9072362. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
The present study aimed to identify the perceptions of gas station workers about physical, chemical, biological and physiological risk factors to which they are exposed in their work environment; identify types of occupational accidents involving gas station workers and; report the development of a socioenvironmental intervention as a tool for risk communication to gas station workers. A quantitative study was performed with 221 gas station workers in southern Brazil between October and December 2010. Data collection was performed between October to December 2010 via structured interviews. The data were analyzed using SPSS 19.0. The participants identified the following risk types: chemical (93.7%), physical (88.2%), physiological (64.3%) and biological (62.4%). In this sample, 94.1% of gas station workers reported occupational accidents, and 74.2% reported fuel contact with the eyes (p < 0.05). It is concluded that workers perceive risks, and that they tend to relate risks with the occurrence of occupational accidents as an indicator of the dangerous nature of their work environment.
本研究旨在识别加油站工作人员对其工作环境中所接触的物理、化学、生物和生理风险因素的看法;识别涉及加油站工作人员的职业事故类型;并报告作为向加油站工作人员进行风险沟通工具的社会环境干预措施的制定。2010 年 10 月至 12 月期间,在巴西南部对 221 名加油站工作人员进行了一项定量研究。通过结构化访谈在 2010 年 10 月至 12 月期间进行了数据收集。使用 SPSS 19.0 对数据进行了分析。参与者确定了以下风险类型:化学(93.7%)、物理(88.2%)、生理(64.3%)和生物(62.4%)。在这个样本中,94.1%的加油站工人报告了职业事故,74.2%的工人报告了燃料接触眼睛(p<0.05)。结论是,工人感知到风险,并且他们倾向于将风险与职业事故的发生联系起来,作为其工作环境危险性质的指标。