• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

主动脉瓣狭窄且血流正常患者的主动脉瓣峰值流速截断值与其他多普勒超声心动图严重程度参数截断值之间的关系。

Relationship between cutoff values of peak aortic valve velocity and those of other Doppler echocardiographic parameters of severity in patients with aortic stenosis and normal flow.

作者信息

Castel Anne-Laure, Maréchaux Sylvestre, Laaouaj Jamal, Rusinaru Dan, Levy Franck, Tribouilloy Christophe

机构信息

Cardiology Department, Inserm, ERI 12, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens, France.

出版信息

Echocardiography. 2012 Nov;29(10):1150-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2012.01790.x. Epub 2012 Aug 3.

DOI:10.1111/j.1540-8175.2012.01790.x
PMID:22862297
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have reported inconsistencies between echocardiographic parameters of severity in aortic valve stenosis (AS). Peak aortic valve velocity (Vmax ) strongly predicts outcome in AS patients. This study was therefore designed to identify the cutoff values of echocardiographic parameters of severity corresponding to a Vmax ≥ 3 m/sec, ≥4 m/sec, 5 m/sec, or 5.50 m/sec in a large cohort of patients with normal flow (NF) AS.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We retrospectively reviewed the echocardiograms of 528 consecutive patients with normal flow (NF) AS, left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction ≥0.50, and NF (stroke volume index > 35 mL/m²). The values of mean pressure gradient (MPG), aortic valve area (AVA), and indexed aortic valve area (IAVA) corresponding to Vmax ≥ 3 m/sec obtained from receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves analysis were 22 mmHg, 1.15 cm(2) , and 0.60 cm(2) /m(2) , respectively. While a cutoff of Vmax ≥ 4 m/sec to define severe AS was consistent with a value of 39 mmHg for MPG, corresponding values for AVA and IAVA of 0.90 cm² and 0.48 cm²/m², respectively, were substantially different from those recommended in current guidelines. MPG ≥60 and 65 mmHg, AVA ≤0.76 and ≤0.68 cm², and IAVA ≤0.41 and ≤0.35 cm(2) /m(2) were related to a Vmax ≥5 and ≥5.5 m/sec (very severe AS), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Guidelines recommended cutoff values for AVA and IAVA are not consistent with those of Vmax and MPG. The results of this study may serve as safeguard in case of apparent inconsistencies between echocardiographic parameters of severity in NF AS.

摘要

背景

既往研究报道了主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)严重程度的超声心动图参数之间存在不一致性。主动脉瓣峰值流速(Vmax)能有力地预测AS患者的预后。因此,本研究旨在确定在一大群正常血流(NF)AS患者中,与Vmax≥3m/秒、≥4m/秒、5m/秒或5.50m/秒相对应的严重程度的超声心动图参数的临界值。

方法与结果

我们回顾性分析了528例连续的正常血流(NF)AS、左心室(LV)射血分数≥0.50且NF(每平方米体表面积的每搏输出量>35ml)患者的超声心动图。通过受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析得出,与Vmax≥3m/秒相对应的平均压力阶差(MPG)、主动脉瓣面积(AVA)和主动脉瓣面积指数(IAVA)的值分别为22mmHg、1.15cm²和0.60cm²/m²。虽然将Vmax≥4m/秒作为定义重度AS的临界值与MPG为39mmHg一致,但AVA和IAVA的相应值分别为0.90cm²和0.

相似文献

1
Relationship between cutoff values of peak aortic valve velocity and those of other Doppler echocardiographic parameters of severity in patients with aortic stenosis and normal flow.主动脉瓣狭窄且血流正常患者的主动脉瓣峰值流速截断值与其他多普勒超声心动图严重程度参数截断值之间的关系。
Echocardiography. 2012 Nov;29(10):1150-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2012.01790.x. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
2
Inconsistencies of echocardiographic criteria for the grading of aortic valve stenosis.主动脉瓣狭窄分级的超声心动图标准存在不一致性。
Eur Heart J. 2008 Apr;29(8):1043-8. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm543. Epub 2007 Dec 22.
3
The complex nature of discordant severe calcified aortic valve disease grading: new insights from combined Doppler echocardiographic and computed tomographic study.不和谐严重钙化主动脉瓣疾病分级的复杂性:联合多普勒超声心动图和计算机断层扫描研究的新见解。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Dec 17;62(24):2329-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.1621. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
4
Inconsistent echocardiographic grading of aortic stenosis: is the left ventricular outflow tract important?主动脉瓣狭窄的超声心动图分级不一致:左心室流出道重要吗?
Heart. 2013 Jul;99(13):921-31. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2012-302881. Epub 2013 Jan 24.
5
Impact of concomitant mitral regurgitation on transvalvular gradient and flow in severe aortic stenosis: a systematic ex vivo analysis of a subentity of low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis.合并二尖瓣反流对重度主动脉瓣狭窄跨瓣梯度和流量的影响:低流量低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄亚组的系统离体分析。
EuroIntervention. 2018 Feb 20;13(14):1635-1644. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00476.
6
Aortic valve area, stroke volume, left ventricular hypertrophy, remodeling, and fibrosis in aortic stenosis assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: comparison between high and low gradient and normal and low flow aortic stenosis.心脏磁共振成像评估主动脉瓣狭窄的瓣口面积、心搏量、左心室肥厚、重构和纤维化:高梯度和低梯度、正常流量和低流量主动脉瓣狭窄的比较。
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Nov;6(6):1009-17. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.113.000515. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
7
Doppler Imaging in Aortic Stenosis: The Importance of the Nonapical Imaging Windows to Determine Severity in a Contemporary Cohort.主动脉瓣狭窄的多普勒成像:非心尖成像窗在当代队列中确定严重程度的重要性。
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015 Jul;28(7):780-5. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2015.02.016. Epub 2015 Apr 6.
8
Independent contribution of left ventricular ejection time to the mean gradient in aortic stenosis.左心室射血时间对主动脉瓣狭窄平均压力阶差的独立作用。
J Heart Valve Dis. 2002 Sep;11(5):615-23.
9
Outcome Implication of Aortic Valve Area Normalized to Body Size in Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis.无症状主动脉瓣狭窄中主动脉瓣面积与身体大小标准化后的结局影响
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Nov;9(11). doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.116.005121.
10
Risk Stratification of Severe Aortic Stenosis With Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Using Peak Aortic Jet Velocity: An Outcome Study.使用主动脉峰值射流速度对左心室射血分数保留的严重主动脉瓣狭窄进行风险分层:一项结局研究。
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Oct;10(10). doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.117.006760.

引用本文的文献

1
Valvulo-Arterial Impedance and Dimensionless Index for Risk Stratifying Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis.用于重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者风险分层的瓣膜 - 动脉阻抗及无量纲指数
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Dec 2;8:742297. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.742297. eCollection 2021.
2
Prognostic Impact of Aortic Valve Area in Conservatively Managed Patients With Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis With Preserved Ejection Fraction.射血分数保留的无症状重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者保守治疗的主动脉瓣口面积对预后的影响。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Feb 5;8(3):e010198. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.010198.
3
Impact of Mean Transaortic Pressure Gradient on Long-Term Outcome in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction.
平均跨主动脉压力梯度对重度主动脉瓣狭窄且左心室射血分数保留患者长期预后的影响
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Jun 1;6(6):e005850. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.005850.
4
Prognostic Value of Aortic Valve Area by Doppler Echocardiography in Patients With Severe Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis.经胸多普勒超声心动图测量主动脉瓣口面积对严重无症状性主动脉瓣狭窄患者的预后价值。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 May 3;5(5):e003146. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.003146.