• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

特定益生菌可否用于艰难梭菌感染的一级预防?

Is primary prevention of Clostridium difficile infection possible with specific probiotics?

机构信息

Hines VA Hospital and Loyola University Medical Center, Hines, Chicago, IL 60141, USA.

出版信息

Int J Infect Dis. 2012 Nov;16(11):e786-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2012.06.005. Epub 2012 Aug 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijid.2012.06.005
PMID:22863358
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of probiotics for the prevention of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is highly controversial, particularly with regard to the prevention of recurrent CDI. We hypothesize that primary prevention of CDI among patients receiving antibiotics might be a more achievable goal for probiotics than prevention in patients with previous CDI where the host flora is markedly altered.

METHODS

We conducted a literature search for randomized, placebo-controlled efficacy studies of probiotic use among adults receiving antibiotics, in which CDI was one of the outcomes measured. In addition, we conducted meta-analyses of probiotics that were included in more than one randomized trial.

RESULTS

Eleven studies were identified; most were seriously underpowered to determine the efficacy of probiotics in the prevention of CDI. Two showed significantly lower rates of CDI among the probiotic recipients. A meta-analysis of three studies that used the probiotic combination Lactobacillus acidophilus CL1285 and Lactobacillus casei LBC80R and a combined analysis of those studies with four studies that used Saccharomyces boulardii, showed lower CDI rates in recipients of probiotics compared with recipients of placebo (risk ratio=0.39; 95% confidence interval 0.19-0.79).

CONCLUSIONS

While potential flaws in study design were identified, a review of the available literature suggests that the primary prevention of CDI with specific probiotic agents may be achievable. Additional studies of sufficient size and with rigorous design are needed to confirm these findings.

摘要

背景

益生菌预防艰难梭菌感染(CDI)的疗效存在很大争议,尤其是在预防复发性 CDI 方面。我们假设,对于接受抗生素治疗的患者,益生菌预防 CDI 的主要目标可能比预防先前 CDI 患者的 CDI 更为可行,因为后者的宿主菌群明显改变。

方法

我们对接受抗生素治疗的成年人使用益生菌预防 CDI 的随机、安慰剂对照疗效研究进行了文献检索,其中 CDI 是测量的结果之一。此外,我们还对包含在多个随机试验中的益生菌进行了荟萃分析。

结果

确定了 11 项研究;大多数研究的功效都不足以确定益生菌在预防 CDI 方面的疗效。有两项研究显示益生菌组的 CDI 发生率明显较低。对使用嗜酸乳杆菌 CL1285 和干酪乳杆菌 LBC80R 益生菌组合的三项研究进行荟萃分析,以及对使用布拉氏酵母菌的四项研究进行综合分析,结果显示益生菌组的 CDI 发生率低于安慰剂组(风险比=0.39;95%置信区间 0.19-0.79)。

结论

尽管研究设计存在潜在缺陷,但对现有文献的回顾表明,使用特定益生菌预防 CDI 可能是可行的。需要进一步开展足够规模和严格设计的研究来证实这些发现。

相似文献

1
Is primary prevention of Clostridium difficile infection possible with specific probiotics?特定益生菌可否用于艰难梭菌感染的一级预防?
Int J Infect Dis. 2012 Nov;16(11):e786-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2012.06.005. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
2
Primary prevention of Clostridium difficile infections with a specific probiotic combining Lactobacillus acidophilus, L. casei, and L. rhamnosus strains: assessing the evidence.特定益生菌联合嗜酸乳杆菌、干酪乳杆菌和鼠李糖乳杆菌菌株预防艰难梭菌感染的一级预防:评估证据。
J Hosp Infect. 2018 Aug;99(4):443-452. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2018.04.017. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
3
The fascination with probiotics for Clostridium difficile infection: lack of evidence for prophylactic or therapeutic efficacy.对艰难梭菌感染使用益生菌的关注:缺乏预防或治疗疗效的证据。
Anaerobe. 2009 Dec;15(6):281-4. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2009.08.005. Epub 2009 Aug 20.
4
Probiotics and prevention of Clostridium difficile infection.益生菌与艰难梭菌感染的预防
Anaerobe. 2017 Jun;45:114-119. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2016.12.007. Epub 2016 Dec 14.
5
Prevention of Clostridium difficile Infection With Probiotics.益生菌预防艰难梭菌感染。
Clin Infect Dis. 2015 May 15;60 Suppl 2:S122-8. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ138.
6
Probiotics in Clostridium difficile infection: reviewing the need for a multistrain probiotic.艰难梭菌感染中的益生菌:多菌株益生菌的需求评估。
Benef Microbes. 2013 Mar 1;4(1):39-51. doi: 10.3920/BM2012.0049.
7
Effectiveness of Probiotic for Primary Prevention of Clostridium difficile Infection: A Single-Center Before-and-After Quality Improvement Intervention at a Tertiary-Care Medical Center.益生菌对艰难梭菌感染一级预防的有效性:一家三级医疗中心的单中心前后质量改进干预。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018 Jul;39(7):765-770. doi: 10.1017/ice.2018.76. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
8
A Decade of Experience in Primary Prevention of Clostridium difficile Infection at a Community Hospital Using the Probiotic Combination Lactobacillus acidophilus CL1285, Lactobacillus casei LBC80R, and Lactobacillus rhamnosus CLR2 (Bio-K+).使用益生菌组合嗜酸乳杆菌 CL1285、干酪乳杆菌 LBC80R 和鼠李糖乳杆菌 CLR2(Bio-K+)对社区医院艰难梭菌感染进行初级预防的十年经验。
Clin Infect Dis. 2015 May 15;60 Suppl 2:S144-7. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ178.
9
Evidence-based review of probiotics for antibiotic-associated diarrhea and Clostridium difficile infections.抗生素相关性腹泻和艰难梭菌感染的益生菌治疗的循证评价。
Anaerobe. 2009 Dec;15(6):274-80. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2009.09.002. Epub 2009 Oct 13.
10
Deciphering meta-analytic results: a mini-review of probiotics for the prevention of paediatric antibiotic-associated diarrhoea and Clostridium difficile infections.解读荟萃分析结果:益生菌预防儿童抗生素相关性腹泻和艰难梭菌感染的小型综述。
Benef Microbes. 2015;6(2):189-94. doi: 10.3920/BM2014.0034.

引用本文的文献

1
infection in a skilled nursing facility (SNF): cost savings of an automated, standardized probiotic antimicrobial stewardship programme (ASP) policy.熟练护理机构(SNF)中的感染:自动化、标准化益生菌抗菌药物管理计划(ASP)政策的成本节约
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2023 Sep 6;5(5):dlad102. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlad102. eCollection 2023 Oct.
2
Future Modulation of Gut Microbiota: From Eubiotics to FMT, Engineered Bacteria, and Phage Therapy.肠道微生物群的未来调控:从生态制剂到粪便微生物群移植、工程菌和噬菌体疗法。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 May 8;12(5):868. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12050868.
3
Impact of Nucleic Acid Amplification Test on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Infection.
核酸扩增检测对感染患者临床结局的影响
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Feb 21;12(3):428. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12030428.
4
A systematic review on selection characterization and implementation of probiotics in human health.关于益生菌在人类健康中的选择、特性及应用的系统评价
Food Sci Biotechnol. 2023 Jan 10;32(4):423-440. doi: 10.1007/s10068-022-01210-z. eCollection 2023 Mar.
5
Health economic evaluation alongside the Probiotics to Prevent Severe Pneumonia and Endotracheal Colonization Trial (E-PROSPECT): a cost-effectiveness analysis.益生菌预防重症肺炎和气管定植试验(E-PROSPECT)的卫生经济学评价:成本效果分析。
Can J Anaesth. 2022 Dec;69(12):1515-1526. doi: 10.1007/s12630-022-02335-9. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
6
Induced Inflammasome Activation and Coagulation Derangements.诱导性炎性小体激活与凝血紊乱。
Microorganisms. 2022 Aug 10;10(8):1624. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10081624.
7
Risk Factors, Diagnosis, and Management of Infection in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.炎症性肠病患者感染的危险因素、诊断及管理
Microorganisms. 2022 Jun 29;10(7):1315. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10071315.
8
Yeast Genomics and Its Applications in Biotechnological Processes: What Is Our Present and Near Future?酵母基因组学及其在生物技术过程中的应用:我们的现状与不久的将来会怎样?
J Fungi (Basel). 2022 Jul 20;8(7):752. doi: 10.3390/jof8070752.
9
Probiotics: insights and new opportunities for intervention.益生菌:干预的新视角和新机遇。
Crit Rev Microbiol. 2023 May;49(3):414-434. doi: 10.1080/1040841X.2022.2072705. Epub 2022 May 15.
10
Influence of Probiotics on the Development of Infection in Patients Receiving Fluoroquinolones.益生菌对接受氟喹诺酮类药物治疗患者感染发生情况的影响
Pharmacy (Basel). 2021 Aug 18;9(3):141. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy9030141.