Hines VA Hospital and Loyola University Medical Center, Hines, Chicago, IL 60141, USA.
Int J Infect Dis. 2012 Nov;16(11):e786-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2012.06.005. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
The efficacy of probiotics for the prevention of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is highly controversial, particularly with regard to the prevention of recurrent CDI. We hypothesize that primary prevention of CDI among patients receiving antibiotics might be a more achievable goal for probiotics than prevention in patients with previous CDI where the host flora is markedly altered.
We conducted a literature search for randomized, placebo-controlled efficacy studies of probiotic use among adults receiving antibiotics, in which CDI was one of the outcomes measured. In addition, we conducted meta-analyses of probiotics that were included in more than one randomized trial.
Eleven studies were identified; most were seriously underpowered to determine the efficacy of probiotics in the prevention of CDI. Two showed significantly lower rates of CDI among the probiotic recipients. A meta-analysis of three studies that used the probiotic combination Lactobacillus acidophilus CL1285 and Lactobacillus casei LBC80R and a combined analysis of those studies with four studies that used Saccharomyces boulardii, showed lower CDI rates in recipients of probiotics compared with recipients of placebo (risk ratio=0.39; 95% confidence interval 0.19-0.79).
While potential flaws in study design were identified, a review of the available literature suggests that the primary prevention of CDI with specific probiotic agents may be achievable. Additional studies of sufficient size and with rigorous design are needed to confirm these findings.
益生菌预防艰难梭菌感染(CDI)的疗效存在很大争议,尤其是在预防复发性 CDI 方面。我们假设,对于接受抗生素治疗的患者,益生菌预防 CDI 的主要目标可能比预防先前 CDI 患者的 CDI 更为可行,因为后者的宿主菌群明显改变。
我们对接受抗生素治疗的成年人使用益生菌预防 CDI 的随机、安慰剂对照疗效研究进行了文献检索,其中 CDI 是测量的结果之一。此外,我们还对包含在多个随机试验中的益生菌进行了荟萃分析。
确定了 11 项研究;大多数研究的功效都不足以确定益生菌在预防 CDI 方面的疗效。有两项研究显示益生菌组的 CDI 发生率明显较低。对使用嗜酸乳杆菌 CL1285 和干酪乳杆菌 LBC80R 益生菌组合的三项研究进行荟萃分析,以及对使用布拉氏酵母菌的四项研究进行综合分析,结果显示益生菌组的 CDI 发生率低于安慰剂组(风险比=0.39;95%置信区间 0.19-0.79)。
尽管研究设计存在潜在缺陷,但对现有文献的回顾表明,使用特定益生菌预防 CDI 可能是可行的。需要进一步开展足够规模和严格设计的研究来证实这些发现。