Suppr超能文献

对艰难梭菌感染使用益生菌的关注:缺乏预防或治疗疗效的证据。

The fascination with probiotics for Clostridium difficile infection: lack of evidence for prophylactic or therapeutic efficacy.

机构信息

SMBD-Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, 3755 Cote-Ste-Catherine, Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1E2, Canada.

出版信息

Anaerobe. 2009 Dec;15(6):281-4. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2009.08.005. Epub 2009 Aug 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The association of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) with antecedent antibiotic use suggests that perturbation of normal intestinal flora is an important inciting factor. Therefore, the use of probiotics for the prevention and/or therapy of CDI is considered to be theoretically effective.

METHODS

A non-systematic review of the literature evaluating the prophylactic and therapeutic efficacy of oral bacterial or yeast products for CDI, as well as the "quality control" and deleterious effects of these agents.

RESULTS

There is no convincing literature which supports the use of bacterial/yeast products to prevent CDI. There is one prophylactic study from the United Kingdom which showed efficacy, but it has been widely criticized as flawed or not generalizable. One other small case-series described the efficacy of Saccharomyces boulardii in preventing CDI relapse, but only in a subset of patients. Many bacterial/yeast products do not contain what they are purported to contain, and may contain other bacterial/fungal constituents not listed on the label. S. boulardii preparations may predispose to bloodstream infections in recipients, and have been associated with fungemia in contiguous patients when prepared at the bedside in intensive care settings.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no persuasive evidence to support the use of bacterial/yeast products for the prevention or treatment of CDI. Oral preparations may not contain what is indicated on the label. Widespread use of some products may lead to bloodstream infections in susceptible individuals, and careless use of S. boulardii in an intensive care setting may place other patients at risk. At the present time, oral bacterial/yeast products do not have a role in the prevention or therapy of CDI.

摘要

背景

艰难梭菌感染(CDI)与先前使用抗生素有关,这表明正常肠道菌群的紊乱是一个重要的诱发因素。因此,使用益生菌预防和/或治疗 CDI 被认为在理论上是有效的。

方法

对评估口服细菌或酵母产品预防和治疗 CDI 的疗效以及这些药物的“质量控制”和有害作用的文献进行非系统性综述。

结果

没有令人信服的文献支持使用细菌/酵母产品预防 CDI。英国有一项预防性研究表明其有效,但该研究受到广泛批评,认为其存在缺陷或不具有普遍性。另一项小型病例系列描述了布拉氏酵母菌预防 CDI 复发的疗效,但仅在一部分患者中有效。许多细菌/酵母产品所含成分与其声称的不符,并且可能含有标签上未列出的其他细菌/真菌成分。布拉氏酵母菌制剂可能使接受者易发生血流感染,并且在重症监护环境中床边制备时,与相邻患者的真菌血症有关。

结论

没有令人信服的证据支持使用细菌/酵母产品预防或治疗 CDI。口服制剂可能未包含标签上注明的内容。一些产品的广泛使用可能会使易感个体发生血流感染,并且在重症监护环境中不谨慎地使用布拉氏酵母菌可能会使其他患者面临风险。目前,口服细菌/酵母产品在预防或治疗 CDI 方面没有作用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验