Institute of Botany, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Ambio. 2012;41 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):197-206. doi: 10.1007/s13280-012-0313-2.
Trees are taller than shrubs, grasses, and herbs. What is the disadvantage of being tall so that trees are restricted to warmer regions than low stature life forms? This article offers a brief review of the current state of biological treeline theory, and then explores the significance of tallness from a carbon balance, freezing resistance, and microclimatological perspective. It will be argued that having of a woody stem is neither a burden to the carbon balance nor does it add to the risk of freezing damage. The physiological means of trees to thrive in cold climates are similar to small stature plants, but due to their size, and, thus, closer aerodynamic coupling to air circulation, trees experience critically low temperatures at lower elevation and latitude than smaller plants. Hence, trees reach a limit at treeline for physical reasons related to their stature.
树木比灌木、草本植物和草更高。那么,树木比矮小的生命形态更局限于温暖地区,高大有什么缺点呢?本文简要回顾了当前生物树线理论的状况,然后从碳平衡、抗冻性和小气候的角度探讨了高大的意义。有人认为,木质茎既不会对碳平衡造成负担,也不会增加冻害的风险。树木在寒冷气候中茁壮成长的生理手段与矮小植物相似,但由于它们的体型较大,与空气循环的气动耦合更为紧密,因此树木在较低海拔和纬度处经历的极低温度比较小的植物更为严重。因此,树木由于与它们的高度有关的物理原因而在树线处达到了极限。