School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Implement Sci. 2012 Aug 7;7:74. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-74.
The Neurotrauma Evidence Translation (NET) program was funded in 2009 to increase the uptake of research evidence in the clinical care of patients who have sustained traumatic brain injury. This paper reports the rationale and plan for this five-year knowledge translation research program. The overarching aims of the program are threefold: to improve outcomes for people with traumatic brain injury; to create a network of neurotrauma clinicians and researchers with expertise in knowledge translation and evidence-based practice; and to contribute knowledge to the field of knowledge translation research. The program comprises a series of interlinked projects spanning varying clinical environments and disciplines relevant to neurotrauma, anchored within four themes representing core knowledge translation activities: reviewing research evidence; understanding practice; developing and testing interventions for practice change; and building capacity for knowledge translation in neurotrauma. The program uses a range of different methods and study designs, including: an evidence fellowship program; conduct of and training in systematic reviews; mixed method study designs to describe and understand factors that influence current practices (e.g., semi-structured interviews and surveys); theory-based methods to develop targeted interventions aiming to change practice; a cluster randomised trial to test the effectiveness of a targeted theory-informed intervention; stakeholder involvement activities; and knowledge translation events such as consensus conferences.
神经创伤证据转化(NET)计划于 2009 年获得资助,旨在促进创伤性脑损伤患者临床护理中研究证据的应用。本文报告了该为期五年的知识转化研究计划的基本原理和计划。该计划的总体目标有三个:改善创伤性脑损伤患者的结局;建立一个具有知识转化和循证实践专业知识的神经创伤临床医生和研究人员网络;为知识转化研究领域贡献知识。该计划由一系列相互关联的项目组成,涵盖了不同的临床环境和与神经创伤相关的学科,围绕着代表核心知识转化活动的四个主题展开:审查研究证据;了解实践;为实践变革开发和测试干预措施;以及在神经创伤领域建立知识转化能力。该计划使用了一系列不同的方法和研究设计,包括:证据研究员计划;系统评价的开展和培训;混合方法研究设计,以描述和理解影响当前实践的因素(例如,半结构化访谈和调查);基于理论的方法,开发旨在改变实践的针对性干预措施;一项针对目标理论的干预措施的集群随机试验,以测试其有效性;利益相关者参与活动;以及知识转化活动,如共识会议。