Suppr超能文献

二氧化碳气腹灌流减少内镜下切除大肠大病灶后的术后住院人数:一项前瞻性队列研究。

Carbon dioxide insufflation reduces number of postprocedure admissions after endoscopic resection of large colonic lesions: a prospective cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Jan;77(1):90-5. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.06.004. Epub 2012 Aug 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic resection (ER) for large colonic lesions is a safe and effective outpatient treatment. Postprocedural pain creates concern for perforation and often results in postprocedure admission (PPA). Carbon dioxide (CO(2)) insufflation has been shown to reduce pain scores after routine colonoscopy, but an influence on more critical outcomes such as PPA has not been shown.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the outcomes of patients undergoing ER for large colonic lesions, comparing those having air versus those having CO(2) insufflation.

DESIGN

Prospective, observational, cohort study.

SETTING

Academic, high-volume, tertiary-care referral center.

PATIENTS

Consecutive patients referred for ER of sessile colorectal polyps ≥20 mm.

INTERVENTION

ER with air or CO(2).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Rates of PPA, technical outcomes, complication rates.

RESULTS

ER was performed on 575 lesions ≥20 mm, 228 with CO(2) insufflation. Mean lesion size was 36.5 mm. Lesion and patient characteristics were similar in both groups. The use of CO(2) was associated with a 62% decrease in the PPA rate from 8.9% to 3.4% (P = .01). This was mainly because of an 82% decrease in PPA for pain from 5.7% to 1.0% (P = .006). There were no significant difference in the rates of complications. Multiple logistical regression was performed. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) of PPA (OR 0.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16-0.95; P = .04) and PPA for pain (OR 0.18; 95% CI, 0.04-0.78; P = .02) in the CO(2) group remained significant.

LIMITATIONS

Single center, nonrandomized study.

CONCLUSION

CO(2) insufflation significantly reduces PPA after ER of large colonic lesions, primarily because of reduced PPA for pain. CO(2) insufflation should be routinely used during ER of large colonic lesions.

摘要

背景

内镜下切除术(ER)是一种安全有效的门诊治疗方法,适用于大型结肠病变。术后疼痛会引起穿孔的担忧,往往导致术后住院(PPA)。二氧化碳(CO2)充气已被证明可降低常规结肠镜检查后的疼痛评分,但尚未证明其对更关键的结果(如 PPA)有影响。

目的

评估接受 ER 治疗的大型结肠病变患者的结局,比较使用空气与 CO2 充气的患者。

设计

前瞻性、观察性、队列研究。

设置

学术性、大容量、三级保健转诊中心。

患者

连续因 ≥20mm 的无蒂结直肠息肉而接受 ER 治疗的患者。

干预

使用空气或 CO2 进行 ER。

主要观察指标

PPA 发生率、技术结局、并发症发生率。

结果

对 575 个≥20mm 的病变进行了 ER,其中 228 个病变使用 CO2 充气。平均病变大小为 36.5mm。两组的病变和患者特征相似。使用 CO2 可将 PPA 发生率从 8.9%降至 3.4%,降低 62%(P =.01)。这主要是因为疼痛相关 PPA 发生率从 5.7%降至 1.0%,降低了 82%(P =.006)。并发症发生率无显著差异。进行了多因素逻辑回归。调整后的 PPA 比值比(OR)(OR 0.39;95%置信区间 [CI],0.16-0.95;P =.04)和 CO2 组疼痛相关 PPA 的比值比(OR 0.18;95% CI,0.04-0.78;P =.02)仍然显著。

局限性

单中心、非随机研究。

结论

CO2 充气可显著降低大型结肠病变 ER 后的 PPA,主要是因为疼痛相关 PPA 减少。CO2 充气应常规用于大型结肠病变的 ER。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验