Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, NY, USA.
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2012;29(1-2):85-103. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2012.704354. Epub 2012 Aug 7.
Models of working memory (WM) have been instrumental in understanding foundational cognitive processes and sources of individual differences. However, current models cannot conclusively explain the consistent group differences between deaf signers and hearing speakers on a number of short-term memory (STM) tasks. Here we take the perspective that these results are not due to a temporal order-processing deficit in deaf individuals, but rather reflect different biases in how different types of memory cues are used to do a given task. We further argue that the main driving force behind the shifts in relative biasing is a consequence of language modality (sign vs. speech) and the processing they afford, and not deafness, per se.
工作记忆(WM)模型在理解基础认知过程和个体差异来源方面发挥了重要作用。然而,目前的模型无法明确解释聋人手语者和听力说话者在许多短期记忆(STM)任务上的一致群体差异。在这里,我们认为这些结果不是由于聋人在时间顺序处理方面的缺陷,而是反映了在执行给定任务时不同类型的记忆线索的使用方式存在不同的偏差。我们进一步认为,导致相对偏向变化的主要驱动力是语言模态(手语与口语)及其提供的处理方式的结果,而不是聋本身。