Cowan Nelson
Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, 18 McAlester Hall, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.
Prog Brain Res. 2008;169:323-38. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(07)00020-9.
In the recent literature there has been considerable confusion about the three types of memory: long-term, short-term, and working memory. This chapter strives to reduce that confusion and makes up-to-date assessments of these types of memory. Long- and short-term memory could differ in two fundamental ways, with only short-term memory demonstrating (1) temporal decay and (2) chunk capacity limits. Both properties of short-term memory are still controversial but the current literature is rather encouraging regarding the existence of both decay and capacity limits. Working memory has been conceived and defined in three different, slightly discrepant ways: as short-term memory applied to cognitive tasks, as a multi-component system that holds and manipulates information in short-term memory, and as the use of attention to manage short-term memory. Regardless of the definition, there are some measures of memory in the short term that seem routine and do not correlate well with cognitive aptitudes and other measures (those usually identified with the term "working memory") that seem more attention demanding and do correlate well with these aptitudes. The evidence is evaluated and placed within a theoretical framework depicted in Fig. 1.
在最近的文献中,对于长期记忆、短期记忆和工作记忆这三种记忆类型存在相当大的混淆。本章致力于减少这种混淆,并对这些记忆类型进行最新评估。长期记忆和短期记忆可能在两个基本方面存在差异,只有短期记忆表现出:(1)时间衰减和(2)组块容量限制。短期记忆的这两个特性仍然存在争议,但就衰减和容量限制的存在而言,当前的文献相当令人鼓舞。工作记忆的概念和定义有三种不同但略有差异的方式:作为应用于认知任务的短期记忆、作为在短期记忆中保存和处理信息的多成分系统,以及作为利用注意力来管理短期记忆。无论采用何种定义,短期记忆中有一些测量方法似乎较为常规,与认知能力的相关性不佳,而其他一些测量方法(通常与“工作记忆”一词相关)似乎对注意力要求更高,且与这些能力的相关性良好。对相关证据进行了评估,并置于图1所示的理论框架之中。