Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Behav Med. 2012;38(3):90-114. doi: 10.1080/08964289.2012.695412.
Careful reviews and meta-analyses have made valuable contributions to understanding the efficacy of psychosocial interventions for cancer patients. An important next step is to determine the mediators that explain the influence of efficacious interventions on outcomes. This systematic review summarizes tests of mediating variables from twenty-two projects conducted from 1989-2010. Although all authors provided some type of rationale for considering particular mediating relationships, the investigations varied widely with respect to the extent to which formal theoretical constructs were tested, the type and goals of the interventions studied, and the broad types of outcomes and potential mediators examined. Although there was some evidence supporting selected mediating relationships, with positive findings often found when mediating variables represented behaviors targeted by an intervention, the findings were mixed. Expanding the focus of research to include mechanisms in psychosocial oncology intervention research is necessary for providing a unified picture of how mediating relationships may be operating in this field.
精心的回顾和荟萃分析为理解心理社会干预对癌症患者的疗效做出了有价值的贡献。下一步的重要任务是确定可以解释有效干预对结果的影响的中介变量。本系统评价总结了从 1989 年至 2010 年进行的 22 个项目中测试中介变量的情况。尽管所有作者都对考虑特定中介关系的理由进行了说明,但这些研究在很大程度上存在差异,包括对正式理论结构的测试程度、所研究干预措施的类型和目标,以及所检查的广泛类型的结果和潜在的中介变量。虽然有一些证据支持某些中介关系,但当干预措施所针对的行为作为中介变量时,通常会发现积极的结果,但结果是混合的。扩大研究重点,将心理肿瘤学干预研究中的机制纳入其中,对于提供一幅统一的画面,说明中介关系在这一领域是如何运作的是必要的。