Suppr超能文献

左心室辅助装置对颈动脉顺应性和扩张性的影响。

Effects of the left ventricular assist device on the compliance and distensibility of the carotid artery.

作者信息

Templeton Danielle L, John Ranjit, Painter Patricia, Kelly Aaron S, Dengel Donald R

机构信息

School of Kinesiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.

出版信息

Heart Vessels. 2013 May;28(3):377-84. doi: 10.1007/s00380-012-0271-4. Epub 2012 Aug 9.

Abstract

We investigated the impact of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) on the carotid elastic properties. Carotid artery parameters (diameter distensibility (DD), cross-sectional distensibility (CSD), diameter compliance (DC), cross-sectional compliance (CSC), and incremental elastic modulus (IEM)) were measured in a cross-sectional study using a standard ultrasound with a 10-MHz linear array probe. Measurements (mean ± SEM) were made in separate groups at various clinical time points: prior to LVAD surgery (baseline; 13 male/3 female; age 48 ± 3 years), 1 week following LVAD placement (acute; 12 male/2 female; age 47 ± 3 years), approximately 24 weeks following LVAD surgery (chronic; 13 male/2 female; age 52 ± 3 years), and in a group of healthy subjects (controls; 9 male/1 female; age 51 ± 4 years). Distensibility properties were lower (P < 0.05) in the acute (DD 2.3 % ± 0.4 %; CSD 4.7 % ± 0.8 %) and chronic (DD 2.2 % ± 0.4 %; CSD 4.5 ± 0.9 %) compared with the baseline (DD 5.9 % ± 0.7 %; CSD 12.2 % ± 1.5 %) and control (DD 5.8 % ± 0.6 %; CSD 11.9 % ± 1.3 %) groups. Compliance properties were lower (P < 0.05) in the chronic (DC 4.4 ± 0.7 mm/mmHg × 10(-3); CSC 1.2 ± 0.2 mmHg(-1) × 10(-3)) compared with acute (DC 9.0 ± 1.6 mm/mmHg × 10(-3); CSC 2.6 ± 0.4 mmHg(-1) × 10(-3)) and baseline (DC 11.1 ± 1.1 mm/mmHg × 10(-3); CSC 3.3 ± 0.4 mmHg(-1) × 10(-3)) groups. The compliance properties in the control (DC 8.3 ± 0.8 mm/mmHg × 10(-3); CSC 2.4 ± 0.2 mmHg(-1) × 10(-3)) group were not different from any of the patient groups. The IEM was higher (P < 0.05) in the chronic (6908 ± 1269 mmHg) compared with acute (2739 ± 412 mmHg), baseline (1849 ± 177 mmHg), and control (2349 ± 241 mmHg) groups. Chronic continuous-flow LVAD support is associated with lower carotid artery compliance and distensibility, which may place further strain on the left ventricle.

摘要

我们研究了连续血流左心室辅助装置(LVAD)对颈动脉弹性特性的影响。在一项横断面研究中,使用配备10MHz线性阵列探头的标准超声测量颈动脉参数(直径扩张性(DD)、横截面积扩张性(CSD)、直径顺应性(DC)、横截面积顺应性(CSC)和增量弹性模量(IEM))。在不同临床时间点对不同组进行测量(均值±标准误):LVAD手术前(基线;13名男性/3名女性;年龄48±3岁)、LVAD植入后1周(急性期;12名男性/2名女性;年龄47±3岁)、LVAD手术后约24周(慢性期;13名男性/2名女性;年龄52±3岁),以及一组健康受试者(对照组;9名男性/1名女性;年龄51±4岁)。与基线组(DD 5.9%±0.7%;CSD 12.2%±1.5%)和对照组(DD 5.8%±0.6%;CSD 11.9%±1.3%)相比,急性期(DD 2.3%±0.4%;CSD 4.7%±0.8%)和慢性期(DD 2.2%±0.4%;CSD 4.5±0.9%)的扩张性特性较低(P<0.05)。与急性期(DC 9.0±1.6 mm/mmHg×10⁻³;CSC 2.6±0.4 mmHg⁻¹×10⁻³)和基线组(DC 11.1±1.1 mm/mmHg×10⁻³;CSC 3.3±0.4 mmHg⁻¹×10⁻³)相比,慢性期(DC 4.4±0.7 mm/mmHg×10⁻³;CSC 1.2±0.2 mmHg⁻¹×10⁻³)的顺应性特性较低(P<0.05)。对照组(DC 8.3±0.8 mm/mmHg×10⁻³;CSC 2.4±0.2 mmHg⁻¹×10⁻³)的顺应性特性与任何患者组均无差异。与急性期(2739±412 mmHg)、基线组(18889±177 mmHg)和对照组(2349±241 mmHg)相比,慢性期(6908±1269 mmHg)的IEM较高(P<0.05)。慢性连续血流LVAD支持与较低的颈动脉顺应性和扩张性相关,这可能会给左心室带来进一步的压力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验