• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同表面污染物对两种不同代粘结剂微渗漏的影响:一项体视显微镜研究

The effect of various surface contaminants on the microleakage of two different generation bonding agents: A stereomicroscopic study.

作者信息

Kumar Pragya, Shenoy Arvind, Joshi Sonal

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, ITS-CDSR, Muradnagar, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.

出版信息

J Conserv Dent. 2012 Jul;15(3):265-9. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.97955.

DOI:10.4103/0972-0707.97955
PMID:22876016
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3410339/
Abstract

AIM

The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the microleakage of two different generation bonding agents in the presence of various surface contaminants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Class V cavities were prepared on 150 extracted human permanent molars. The samples were randomly divided into two main groups of 75 teeth each. Group I: Fifth generation bonding system (Single Bond, 3M). Group II: Seventh generation bonding system (iBond, Kulzer). Subgroups were formed according to exposure to different surface contaminants (saliva, blood, caries disclosing agent and haemostatic agent). Cavities were restored with hybrid composite (Z-100, 3M) and evaluated for microleakage. The scores were subjected to 't' test and analysis of variance (ANOVA) test.

RESULTS

Single Bond and iBond did not provide complete resistance to microleakage when there was no contamination. Microleakage was minimum in the no contamination subgroup and maximum with the haemostatic agent subgroup for both the groups.

CONCLUSION

Single bond showed lesser micro leakage in contaminated conditions.

摘要

目的

本体外研究的目的是评估在存在各种表面污染物的情况下两种不同代粘结剂的微渗漏情况。

材料与方法

在150颗拔除的人类恒牙上制备V类洞。样本随机分为两个主要组,每组75颗牙。第一组:第五代粘结系统(单键,3M)。第二组:第七代粘结系统(iBond,库尔泽)。根据暴露于不同表面污染物(唾液、血液、龋齿显示剂和止血剂)形成亚组。用混合复合材料(Z - 100,3M)修复窝洞,并评估微渗漏情况。对分数进行“t”检验和方差分析(ANOVA)检验。

结果

当没有污染时,单键和iBond都不能完全抵抗微渗漏。两组在无污染亚组中的微渗漏最小,在止血剂亚组中最大。

结论

在污染条件下单键显示出较小的微渗漏。

相似文献

1
The effect of various surface contaminants on the microleakage of two different generation bonding agents: A stereomicroscopic study.不同表面污染物对两种不同代粘结剂微渗漏的影响:一项体视显微镜研究
J Conserv Dent. 2012 Jul;15(3):265-9. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.97955.
2
Microleakage and shear punch bond strength in class II primary molars cavities restored with low shrink silorane based versus methacrylate based composite using three different techniques.使用三种不同技术,比较基于低收缩硅氧烷的复合材料与基于甲基丙烯酸酯的复合材料修复II类乳牙龋洞后的微渗漏和剪切冲头粘结强度。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2010 Winter;35(2):173-81. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.35.2.u6142007hj421041.
3
Effect of Different Cavity Disinfectants on Marginal Sealing Ability of a Seventh-generation Dentin Bonding Agent: An Study.不同窝洞消毒剂对第七代牙本质粘结剂边缘封闭能力的影响:一项研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2020 Mar 1;21(3):242-248.
4
Evaluation of Microleakage with Total Etch, Self Etch and Universal Adhesive Systems in Class V Restorations: An In vitro Study.第五类洞修复中全酸蚀、自酸蚀和通用粘结系统微渗漏的评估:一项体外研究。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Apr;11(4):ZC53-ZC56. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/24907.9680. Epub 2017 Apr 1.
5
Influence of cavity configuration on microleakage around Class V restorations bonded with seven self-etching adhesives.窝洞形态对使用七种自酸蚀粘结剂粘结的Ⅴ类洞修复体边缘微渗漏的影响。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2004;16(2):128-35; discussion 136. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2004.tb00020.x.
6
Microleakage of a Self-adhesive Composite of Class V Cavities: Effect of Surface Treatment and Thermocycling.V类洞自粘结复合树脂的微渗漏:表面处理和热循环的影响
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2020 Jul 1;21(7):781-786.
7
The effects of dentin adhesives and liner materials on the microleakage of class II resin composite restorations in primary and permanent teeth.牙本质黏结剂和垫底材料对乳恒牙Ⅱ类树脂复合体修复体微渗漏的影响。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2014 Spring;38(3):223-8. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.38.3.h551um6313618465.
8
Comparison of shear bond strength and micro-leakage of three commercially available seventh generation bonding agents in primary anterior teeth: an in vitro study.三种市售第七代粘结剂在前牙乳牙中的剪切粘结强度和微渗漏比较:一项体外研究
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2015 Apr-Jun;33(2):116-21. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.155123.
9
Microleakage of Er:YAG laser and dental bur prepared cavities in primary teeth restored with different adhesive restorative materials.Er:YAG 激光与牙钻制备的乳牙窝洞微渗漏与不同粘接修复材料修复的比较。
Lasers Med Sci. 2013 Nov;28(6):1453-60. doi: 10.1007/s10103-012-1222-0. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
10
Self-etching bonding systems: in-vitro micro-leakage evaluation.自酸蚀粘结系统:体外微渗漏评估
SADJ. 2006 Jul;61(6):248, 250-1.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effect of Hemostatic Agents on the Retention Strength of Zirconia Crowns Luted to Dentin Abutments.止血剂对粘结于牙本质基牙上的氧化锆全冠固位强度的影响
Materials (Basel). 2019 Mar 25;12(6):979. doi: 10.3390/ma12060979.
2
Marginal Integrity of Cervical Restorations with Caries-Affected Dentinal Walls: Effect of Contamination with Hemostatic Agents.龋损影响牙本质壁的颈部修复体边缘完整性:止血剂污染的影响
J Dent (Tehran). 2018 Jul;15(4):214-221.
3
Combination Effect of Hemostatic and Disinfecting Agents on Micro-leakage of Restorations Bonded with Different Bonding Systems.止血与消毒制剂对不同粘结系统粘结修复体微渗漏的联合作用
J Dent Biomater. 2016 Sep;3(3):292-298.
4
Marginal integrity of low-shrinkage and methacrylate-based composite resins: Effect of three different hemostatic agents.低收缩率甲基丙烯酸酯基复合树脂的边缘完整性:三种不同止血剂的影响
J Clin Exp Dent. 2016 Apr 1;8(2):e178-83. doi: 10.4317/jced.52782. eCollection 2016 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
The effect of tooth-preparation cleansing protocol on the bond strength of self-adhesive resin cement to dentin contaminated with a hemostatic agent.牙体预备清洁方案对止血剂污染牙本质的自粘接树脂水门汀粘结强度的影响。
Oper Dent. 2011 Jan-Feb;36(1):18-26. doi: 10.2341/09-308-LR1. Epub 2011 Feb 21.
2
Comparative evaluation of microleakage of fifth, sixth, and seventh generation dentin bonding agents: An in vitro study.第五、六、七代牙本质粘结剂微渗漏的比较评价:一项体外研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2010 Jul;13(3):136-40. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.71645.
3
An in vitro evaluation of microleakage in class I preparations using 5th, 6th and 7th generation composite bonding agents.
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2005 Summer;29(4):323-8. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.29.4.b51q018j100403p5.
4
Bond strength of composite to astringent-contaminated dentin using self-etching adhesives.
Am J Dent. 2005 Jun;18(3):168-72.
5
Effect of residual caries-disclosing solutions on microleakage of a dental adhesive system.
Quintessence Int. 2005 Mar;36(3):169-76.
6
Microleakage of Compoglass-F and Dyract-AP compomers in Class V preparations after salivary contamination.唾液污染后V类洞型中Compoglass-F和Dyract-AP复合体的微渗漏情况。
Pediatr Dent. 2000 Jan-Feb;22(1):39-42.
7
Cavity preparation factors and microleakage of Class II composite restorations filled at intraoral temperatures.Ⅱ类复合树脂修复体在口内温度下充填时的窝洞预备因素与微渗漏
Am J Dent. 1999 Jun;12(3):123-30.
8
Comparison of microleakage for three one-bottle and three multiple-step dentin bonding agents.三种单瓶和三种多步骤牙本质粘结剂的微渗漏比较
J Prosthet Dent. 1999 Aug;82(2):209-13. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(99)70158-7.
9
Ultrastructure of the resin-dentin interface following reversible and irreversible rewetting.可逆和不可逆再湿润后树脂-牙本质界面的超微结构
Am J Dent. 1997 Apr;10(2):77-82.
10
Saliva contamination of dentin bonding agents.
Oper Dent. 1994 Nov-Dec;19(6):205-10.