Dahlback A, Moan J
Institute of Physics, University of Oslo, Norway.
Photochem Photobiol. 1990 Nov;52(5):1025-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1990.tb01820.x.
In most calculations of annual fluences of carcinogenic light as well as of the radiation amplification factor and of biological amplification factors associated with ozone depletions, the radiation is assumed to fall on a horizontally oriented plane surface. This is obviously a bad approximation of the surface of the human body. In order to evaluate the importance of using a realistic geometric representation of the surface of the human body we here present calculations of the flux of carcinogenically effective radiation falling on three different bodies: a vertically standing cylinder, a sphere and a horizontally oriented surface. The exposure to carcinogenic radiation depends strongly on the surface geometry. However we find that the radiation amplification factors are almost independent of the surface geometry chosen. The biological amplification factors for the three geometrical representations are also similar to within 20%. The total amplification factor for the increase in the incidence of non-melanoma skin cancer related to ozone depletion is about 17% larger when a cylindrical representation is used compared to when a plane horizontal surface is considered.
在大多数关于致癌光的年通量以及与臭氧消耗相关的辐射放大因子和生物放大因子的计算中,假定辐射落在水平放置的平面上。这显然是对人体表面的一种糟糕近似。为了评估使用人体表面实际几何表示的重要性,我们在此给出落在三个不同物体上的致癌有效辐射通量的计算结果:一个垂直站立的圆柱体、一个球体和一个水平放置的表面。致癌辐射的暴露程度在很大程度上取决于表面几何形状。然而,我们发现辐射放大因子几乎与所选的表面几何形状无关。三种几何表示的生物放大因子也相似,相差在20%以内。与考虑水平平面时相比,当使用圆柱体表示时,与臭氧消耗相关的非黑色素瘤皮肤癌发病率增加的总放大因子大约大17%。