Friedman School of Nutrition Science & Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA 02111, USA.
Health Policy Plan. 2013 Jul;28(4):386-99. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czs070. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of adding the community-based management of severe acute malnutrition (CMAM) to a community-based health and nutrition programme delivered by community health workers (CHWs) in southern Bangladesh. The cost-effectiveness of this model of treatment for severe acute malnutrition (SAM) was compared with the cost-effectiveness of the 'standard of care' for SAM (i.e. inpatient treatment), augmented with community surveillance by CHWs to detect cases, in a neighbouring area. An activity-based cost model was used, and a societal perspective taken, to include all costs incurred in the programme by providers and participants for the management of SAM in both areas. Cost data were coupled with programme effectiveness data. The community-based strategy cost US$26 per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) averted, compared with US$1344 per DALY averted for inpatient treatment. The average cost to participant households for their child to recover from SAM in community treatment was one-sixth that of inpatient treatment. These results suggest that this model of treatment for SAM is highly cost-effective and that CHWs, given adequate supervision and training, can be employed effectively to expand access to treatment for SAM in Bangladesh.
本研究评估了在孟加拉国南部,将基于社区的严重急性营养不良(CMAM)管理方法添加到由社区卫生工作者(CHW)提供的社区卫生和营养方案中的成本效益。该严重急性营养不良(SAM)治疗模式的成本效益与 SAM 的“标准护理”(即住院治疗)的成本效益进行了比较,在邻近地区,CHW 对社区进行监测以发现病例。采用基于活动的成本模型,并从社会角度出发,包括两个地区中提供者和参与者在 SAM 管理方面发生的所有费用。成本数据与方案效果数据相结合。与住院治疗每残疾调整生命年(DALY)避免花费 1344 美元相比,基于社区的策略每避免一个 DALY 的成本为 26 美元。参与者家庭让孩子从社区治疗中恢复 SAM 的平均费用是住院治疗的六分之一。这些结果表明,这种 SAM 治疗模式具有很高的成本效益,并且在给予充分监督和培训的情况下,可以有效地利用 CHW 来扩大孟加拉国 SAM 治疗的可及性。