Integrative Spinal Research Group, Department of Chiropractic Medicine, University Hospital Balgrist, Zurich, Switzerland.
Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Institute of Human Movement Sciences and Sport, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Aug 1;44(15):E914-E926. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003013.
Systematic review.
To summarize the evidence of neurophysiological effects of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) with a high velocity low amplitude thrust (HVLA-SMT) in asymptomatic and symptomatic humans.
HVLA-SMT is effective in reducing back pain, but its mode of action is not fully understood.
A systematic literature search (until July 2018) was conducted by a professional librarian in seven databases (Medline (OvidSP), Premedline (PubMed), EMBASE, Cochrane, CINAHL, PEDro, and Scopus). Two authors selected the studies according to the a priori described criteria and scored study quality. Only controlled studies of at least moderate quality were included. Effects of HVLA-SMT on a particular outcome measure were defined as more than one study showing a significantly greater effect of HVLA-SMT compared with the control intervention.
From the 18 studies included (932 participants in total), there was evidence only for an association between HVLA-SMT and changes in the autonomic nervous system, reflected in changes in heart rate variability and skin conductance. Most studies focused on healthy volunteers and none related neurophysiologic changes to pain reduction.
This systematic review points to HVLA-SMT affecting the autonomic nervous system. The effects seem to depend on the spinal level of HVLA-SMT application and might differ between healthy volunteers and pain patients. There is a need for high-quality studies that include patients, well characterized for pain duration and outcome measure baseline values, and address the relation between changes in neurophysiology and pain.
系统评价。
总结高速度低幅度推力(HVLA-SMT)脊柱手法治疗对无症状和有症状人群的神经生理效应的证据。
HVLA-SMT 可有效减轻背痛,但其作用机制尚不完全清楚。
由专业图书管理员在七个数据库(Medline(OvidSP)、Premedline(PubMed)、EMBASE、Cochrane、CINAHL、PEDro 和 Scopus)中进行系统文献检索(截至 2018 年 7 月)。两位作者根据预先描述的标准选择研究并对研究质量进行评分。仅纳入至少为中等质量的对照研究。HVLA-SMT 对特定结果测量的影响定义为:与对照干预相比,超过一项研究显示 HVLA-SMT 的效果显著更大。
从纳入的 18 项研究(共 932 名参与者)中,仅发现 HVLA-SMT 与自主神经系统变化之间存在关联,表现在心率变异性和皮肤电导率的变化上。大多数研究都集中在健康志愿者上,没有一项研究将神经生理变化与疼痛减轻联系起来。
本系统评价指出 HVLA-SMT 影响自主神经系统。这种影响似乎取决于 HVLA-SMT 应用的脊柱水平,并且在健康志愿者和疼痛患者之间可能有所不同。需要高质量的研究,包括患者,疼痛持续时间和结果测量基线值特征良好,并解决神经生理学变化与疼痛之间的关系。
2 级。