National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Centre for Prevention and Health Services Research, P.O. Box 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Health Policy. 2012 Oct;107(2-3):108-45. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.06.006. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
To provide insight into the characteristics of comprehensive care programs for patients with multiple chronic conditions and their impact on patients, informal caregivers, and professional caregivers.
Systematic literature search in multiple electronic databases for English language papers published between January 1995 and January 2011, supplemented by reference tracking and a manual search on the internet. Wagner's chronic care model (CCM) was used to define comprehensive care. After inclusion, the methodological quality of each study was assessed. A best-evidence synthesis was applied to draw conclusions.
Forty-two publications were selected describing thirty-three studies evaluating twenty-eight comprehensive care programs for multimorbid patients. Programs varied in the target patient groups, implementation settings, number of included interventions, and number of CCM components to which these interventions related. Moderate evidence was found for a beneficial effect of comprehensive care on inpatient healthcare utilization and healthcare costs, health behavior of patients, perceived quality of care, and satisfaction of patients and caregivers. Insufficient evidence was found for a beneficial effect of comprehensive care on health-related quality of life in terms of mental functioning, medication use, and outpatient healthcare utilization and healthcare costs. No evidence was found for a beneficial effect of comprehensive care on cognitive functioning, depressive symptoms, functional status, mortality, quality of life in terms of physical functioning, and caregiver burden.
Because of the heterogeneity of comprehensive care programs, it is as yet too early to draw firm conclusions regarding their effectiveness. More rigorous evaluation studies are necessary to determine what constitutes best care for the increasing number of people with multiple chronic conditions.
深入了解多种慢性病患者综合护理计划的特点及其对患者、非专业护理人员和专业护理人员的影响。
在多个电子数据库中进行系统的文献检索,检索 1995 年 1 月至 2011 年 1 月期间发表的英文文献,并辅以参考文献追溯和互联网手动搜索。采用 Wagner 的慢性护理模式(CCM)来定义综合护理。纳入研究后,评估每个研究的方法学质量。应用最佳证据综合法得出结论。
选择了 42 篇文献,描述了 33 项评估 28 种多慢性病患者综合护理计划的研究。这些项目在目标患者群体、实施环境、纳入的干预措施数量以及与这些干预措施相关的 CCM 组件数量方面存在差异。有中等质量证据表明,综合护理对住院医疗保健利用和医疗保健成本、患者健康行为、护理质量感知以及患者和护理人员的满意度有有益影响。但综合护理对心理健康功能、药物使用、门诊医疗保健利用和医疗保健成本相关的健康相关生活质量的有益影响证据不足。综合护理对认知功能、抑郁症状、功能状态、死亡率、身体健康相关的生活质量以及护理人员负担没有有益影响的证据。
由于综合护理计划的异质性,目前要确定其有效性还为时过早。需要更严格的评估研究来确定什么是患有多种慢性病的人数不断增加的人群的最佳护理。