Suppr超能文献

环境因素影响草原和森林土壤中低于亚组水平的酸杆菌群落。

Environmental factors affect Acidobacterial communities below the subgroup level in grassland and forest soils.

机构信息

Abt. Mikrobielle Ökophysiologie, Biologie/Chemie, Universität Bremen, Bremen, Germany.

出版信息

Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012 Oct;78(20):7398-406. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01325-12. Epub 2012 Aug 10.

Abstract

In soil, Acidobacteria constitute on average 20% of all bacteria, are highly diverse, and are physiologically active in situ. However, their individual functions and interactions with higher taxa in soil are still unknown. Here, potential effects of land use, soil properties, plant diversity, and soil nanofauna on acidobacterial community composition were studied by cultivation-independent methods in grassland and forest soils from three different regions in Germany. The analysis of 16S rRNA gene clone libraries representing all studied soils revealed that grassland soils were dominated by subgroup Gp6 and forest soils by subgroup Gp1 Acidobacteria. The analysis of a large number of sites (n = 57) by 16S rRNA gene fingerprinting methods (terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism [T-RFLP] and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis [DGGE]) showed that Acidobacteria diversities differed between grassland and forest soils but also among the three different regions. Edaphic properties, such as pH, organic carbon, total nitrogen, C/N ratio, phosphorus, nitrate, ammonium, soil moisture, soil temperature, and soil respiration, had an impact on community composition as assessed by fingerprinting. However, interrelations with environmental parameters among subgroup terminal restriction fragments (T-RFs) differed significantly, e.g., different Gp1 T-RFs correlated positively or negatively with nitrogen content. Novel significant correlations of Acidobacteria subpopulations (i.e., individual populations within subgroups) with soil nanofauna and vascular plant diversity were revealed only by analysis of clone sequences. Thus, for detecting novel interrelations of environmental parameters with Acidobacteria, individual populations within subgroups have to be considered.

摘要

在土壤中,酸杆菌平均构成所有细菌的 20%,具有高度的多样性,并在原位表现出生理活性。然而,它们在土壤中的个体功能及其与高等分类群的相互作用仍然未知。在这里,通过非培养方法研究了土地利用、土壤性质、植物多样性和土壤纳米动物对酸杆菌群落组成的潜在影响,研究对象是来自德国三个不同地区的草地和森林土壤。对代表所有研究土壤的 16S rRNA 基因克隆文库的分析表明,草地土壤主要由亚群 Gp6 ,而森林土壤则由亚群 Gp1 酸杆菌主导。通过大量位点(n = 57)的 16S rRNA 基因指纹图谱分析方法(末端限制性片段长度多态性 [T-RFLP] 和变性梯度凝胶电泳 [DGGE])表明,酸杆菌多样性不仅在草地和森林土壤之间存在差异,而且在三个不同地区之间也存在差异。土壤性质,如 pH 值、有机碳、总氮、C/N 比、磷、硝酸盐、铵、土壤水分、土壤温度和土壤呼吸,对通过指纹图谱评估的群落组成有影响。然而,亚群末端限制性片段(T-RFs)与环境参数之间的相互关系存在显著差异,例如,不同的 Gp1 T-RFs 与氮含量呈正相关或负相关。只有通过克隆序列分析,才揭示了酸杆菌亚群(即亚群内的个别种群)与土壤纳米动物和维管束植物多样性之间的新的显著相关性。因此,为了检测环境参数与酸杆菌之间的新关系,必须考虑亚群内的个别种群。

相似文献

1
Environmental factors affect Acidobacterial communities below the subgroup level in grassland and forest soils.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012 Oct;78(20):7398-406. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01325-12. Epub 2012 Aug 10.
3
4
Contrasting bacterial communities in two indigenous Chionochloa (Poaceae) grassland soils in New Zealand.
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 28;12(6):e0179652. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179652. eCollection 2017.
5
Acidobacterial community responses to agricultural management of soybean in Amazon forest soils.
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2013 Mar;83(3):607-21. doi: 10.1111/1574-6941.12018. Epub 2012 Oct 19.
6
9
Vegetation cover of forest, shrub and pasture strongly influences soil bacterial community structure as revealed by 16S rRNA gene T-RFLP analysis.
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2008 Jun;64(3):449-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00488.x. Epub 2008 Apr 21.

引用本文的文献

5
Bacterial community composition of Hungarian salt-affected soils under different land uses.
Biol Futur. 2024 Sep;75(3):339-350. doi: 10.1007/s42977-024-00235-1. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
7
Response of microbial community composition and function to land use in mining soils of Xikuang Mountain in Hunan.
PLoS One. 2024 May 14;19(5):e0299550. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299550. eCollection 2024.
10
Effects of Degradation on Microbial Communities of an Amazonian Mangrove.
Microorganisms. 2023 May 25;11(6):1389. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11061389.

本文引用的文献

1
Protozoa and plant growth: the microbial loop in soil revisited.
New Phytol. 2004 Jun;162(3):617-631. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01066.x.
2
Group-specific PCR primers for the phylum Acidobacteria designed based on the comparative analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences.
J Microbiol Methods. 2011 Aug;86(2):195-203. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2011.05.003. Epub 2011 May 12.
3
The bacterial biogeography of British soils.
Environ Microbiol. 2011 Jun;13(6):1642-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02480.x. Epub 2011 Apr 20.
6
7
Soil microbial community responses to multiple experimental climate change drivers.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 Feb;76(4):999-1007. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02874-09. Epub 2009 Dec 18.
8
T-REX: software for the processing and analysis of T-RFLP data.
BMC Bioinformatics. 2009 Jun 6;10:171. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-171.
9
Three genomes from the phylum Acidobacteria provide insight into the lifestyles of these microorganisms in soils.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 Apr;75(7):2046-56. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02294-08. Epub 2009 Feb 5.
10
A comprehensive survey of soil acidobacterial diversity using pyrosequencing and clone library analyses.
ISME J. 2009 Apr;3(4):442-53. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2008.127. Epub 2009 Jan 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验