• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

智障人士使用者是否希望参与风险管理过程?主题分析。

Do service users with intellectual disabilities want to be involved in the risk management process? A thematic analysis.

机构信息

Primary Care Psychological Therapies Service, Breightmet Health Centre, Bolton, UK.

出版信息

J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2012 Sep;25(5):433-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3148.2012.00684.x. Epub 2012 Apr 5.

DOI:10.1111/j.1468-3148.2012.00684.x
PMID:22890944
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Involving ID service users in risk decision making necessitates consideration of an individual's ability to assess the implications and associated risks and thus make an informed choice. This calls for research on service users' awareness and understanding of risk management (RM).

METHOD

Thirteen people in a residential ID service who were reviewed under the risk management process (RMP) participated in the research. Thematic analysis explored participants' knowledge and understanding of risk management to establish ability to make informed choice.

RESULTS

Two main meta-themes (lack of awareness about RM and awareness about RM) and four meta-themes (extent of RM awareness, locus of control, compliance and empowerment) emerged. Nine of 13 participants demonstrated some knowledge and awareness of RM and wanted to contribute to the RMP, despite not being consulted about or given the opportunity to be involved in RM.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of service users in this sample had some awareness of the purpose of RM and could make partially informed decisions about whether they would like to be involved in the RMP. The findings highlight the need for professionals to actively attempt to involve ID service users in the management of their own risk.

摘要

背景

让身份服务用户参与风险决策需要考虑个人评估影响和相关风险的能力,从而做出明智的选择。这就需要研究服务用户对风险管理(RM)的认识和理解。

方法

在风险管理流程(RMP)下接受审查的居住身份服务中的 13 人参与了这项研究。主题分析探讨了参与者对风险管理的知识和理解,以确定他们做出明智选择的能力。

结果

出现了两个主要的元主题(对 RM 的认识不足和对 RM 的认识)和四个元主题(对 RM 的认识程度、控制源、合规性和赋权)。13 名参与者中有 9 名表现出对 RM 的一些认识和理解,并希望为 RMP 做出贡献,尽管他们没有被咨询或有机会参与 RM。

结论

本样本中的大多数服务用户对 RM 的目的有一定的认识,并可以对他们是否愿意参与 RMP 做出部分明智的决定。研究结果强调了专业人员需要积极尝试让身份服务用户参与自己的风险管理。

相似文献

1
Do service users with intellectual disabilities want to be involved in the risk management process? A thematic analysis.智障人士使用者是否希望参与风险管理过程?主题分析。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2012 Sep;25(5):433-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3148.2012.00684.x. Epub 2012 Apr 5.
2
Protection, participation and protection through participation: young people with intellectual disabilities and decision making in the family context.保护、参与和通过参与保护:有智力残疾的年轻人及其在家庭环境中的决策。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2012 Nov;56(11):1076-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01649.x.
3
Experiences of mental health services by people with intellectual disabilities from different ethnic groups: a Delphi consultation.不同族裔的智障人士对精神健康服务的体验:德尔菲咨询。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2012 Sep;56(9):902-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01494.x. Epub 2011 Nov 2.
4
The challenges for nurses communicating with and gaining valid consent from adults with intellectual disabilities within the accident and emergency care service.护士在事故与急救护理服务中与成年智障患者沟通并获得有效同意所面临的挑战。
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Sep;16(9):1678-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01642.x. Epub 2007 Apr 24.
5
What qualities are valued in residential direct care workers from the perspective of people with an intellectual disability and managers of accommodation services?从智障人士和住宿服务管理人员的角度来看,居住型直接护理工作者应具备哪些素质?
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2013 Jul;57(7):601-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01565.x. Epub 2012 May 8.
6
Intelligence involves risk-awareness and intellectual disability involves risk-unawareness: implications of a theory of common sense.
J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2011 Dec;36(4):242-53. doi: 10.3109/13668250.2011.626759. Epub 2011 Nov 4.
7
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.人类健康与环境风险的风险管理框架。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.
8
"We want respect": adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities address respect in research.“我们想要尊重”:智力和发育障碍成年人在研究中探讨尊重问题。
Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2012 Jul;117(4):263-74. doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-117.4.263.
9
Attitudes and dilemmas of caregivers supporting people with intellectual disabilities who have diabetes.照顾有糖尿病的智力残疾者的护理人员的态度和困境。
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Jun;87(3):383-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.11.010. Epub 2011 Dec 16.
10
Duty of care and autonomy: how support workers managed the tension between protecting service users from risk and promoting their independence in a specialist group home.注意义务和自主权:在专门的团体家庭中,支持工作人员如何在保护服务使用者免受风险和促进其独立性之间管理这种紧张关系。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2011 Sep;55(9):873-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01445.x. Epub 2011 Jul 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Aligning with the flow of control: A grounded theory study of choice and autonomy in decision-making practices of people with intellectual disabilities.与控制流保持一致:智力残疾人士决策实践中选择和自主性的扎根理论研究。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2021 Dec;16(1):1857053. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2020.1857053.