• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当预测发挥控制作用时:任务预测对任务切换表现的影响。

When predictions take control: the effect of task predictions on task switching performance.

作者信息

Duthoo Wout, De Baene Wouter, Wühr Peter, Notebaert Wim

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2012 Aug 8;3:282. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00282. eCollection 2012.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00282
PMID:22891063
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3413940/
Abstract

In this paper, we aimed to investigate the role of self-generated predictions in the flexible control of behavior. Therefore, we ran a task switching experiment in which participants were asked to try to predict the upcoming task in three conditions varying in switch rate (30, 50, and 70%). Irrespective of their predictions, the color of the target indicated which task participants had to perform. In line with previous studies (Mayr, 2006; Monsell and Mizon, 2006), the switch cost was attenuated as the switch rate increased. Importantly, a clear task repetition bias was found in all conditions, yet the task repetition prediction rate dropped from 78 over 66 to 49% with increasing switch probability in the three conditions. Irrespective of condition, the switch cost was strongly reduced in expectation of a task alternation compared to the cost of an unexpected task alternation following repetition predictions. Hence, our data suggest that the reduction in the switch cost with increasing switch probability is caused by a diminished expectancy for the task to repeat. Taken together, this paper highlights the importance of predictions in the flexible control of behavior, and suggests a crucial role for task repetition expectancy in the context-sensitive adjusting of task switching performance.

摘要

在本文中,我们旨在研究自我生成的预测在行为的灵活控制中的作用。因此,我们进行了一项任务切换实验,要求参与者在三种切换率(30%、50%和70%)不同的条件下尝试预测即将到来的任务。无论他们的预测如何,目标的颜色表明参与者必须执行哪个任务。与先前的研究一致(迈尔,2006年;蒙塞尔和米宗,2006年),随着切换率的增加,切换成本会降低。重要的是,在所有条件下都发现了明显的任务重复偏差,但在这三种条件下,随着切换概率的增加,任务重复预测率从78%降至66%,再降至49%。无论条件如何,与重复预测后意外任务切换的成本相比,预期任务交替时的切换成本会大幅降低。因此,我们的数据表明,随着切换概率的增加,切换成本的降低是由于对任务重复的预期降低所致。综上所述,本文强调了预测在行为灵活控制中的重要性,并表明任务重复预期在任务切换性能的上下文敏感调整中起着关键作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3583/3413940/ed9d7d5774cf/fpsyg-03-00282-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3583/3413940/94f351a9300f/fpsyg-03-00282-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3583/3413940/ed9d7d5774cf/fpsyg-03-00282-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3583/3413940/94f351a9300f/fpsyg-03-00282-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3583/3413940/ed9d7d5774cf/fpsyg-03-00282-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
When predictions take control: the effect of task predictions on task switching performance.当预测发挥控制作用时:任务预测对任务切换表现的影响。
Front Psychol. 2012 Aug 8;3:282. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00282. eCollection 2012.
2
More change in task repetition, less cost in task switching: Behavioral and event-related potential evidence.任务重复变化越大,任务转换成本越低:行为和事件相关电位证据。
Eur J Neurosci. 2021 Apr;53(8):2553-2566. doi: 10.1111/ejn.15113. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
3
Time-Based Transition Expectancy in Task Switching: Do We Need to Know the Task to Switch to?任务切换中基于时间的转换预期:我们需要知道要切换到的任务吗?
J Cogn. 2021 Mar 10;4(1):19. doi: 10.5334/joc.145.
4
Task switching and the measurement of "switch costs".任务切换与“切换成本”的测量。
Psychol Res. 2000;63(3-4):212-33. doi: 10.1007/s004269900003.
5
Exploring task-set reconfiguration with random task sequences.使用随机任务序列探索任务集重新配置。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2005 Mar;118(3):319-31. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2004.10.015. Epub 2004 Nov 25.
6
The Instructed Task-Switch Evaluation Effect: Is the Instruction to Switch Tasks Sufficient to Dislike Task Switch Cues?指导性任务切换评估效应:切换任务的指令是否足以让人讨厌任务切换提示?
J Cogn. 2020 Jan 7;3(1):1. doi: 10.5334/joc.90.
7
Trading off switch costs and stimulus availability benefits: An investigation of voluntary task-switching behavior in a predictable dynamic multitasking environment.权衡转换代价和刺激可得性收益:在可预测的动态多重任务环境中对自愿任务转换行为的研究。
Mem Cognit. 2018 Jul;46(5):699-715. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0802-z.
8
Same same but different? Modeling N-1 switch cost and N-2 repetition cost with the diffusion model and the linear ballistic accumulator model.大同小异?用扩散模型和线性弹道累加器模型对N-1切换成本和N-2重复成本进行建模。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Jul;198:102858. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.05.010. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
9
Brain oscillatory activity associated with switch and mixing costs during reactive control.与反应性控制过程中的转换和混合成本相关的大脑振荡活动。
Psychophysiology. 2020 Nov;57(11):e13642. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13642. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
10
The self-organized task switching paradigm: Movement effort matters.自组织任务转换范式:运动努力很重要。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2021 Nov;221:103446. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103446. Epub 2021 Nov 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Cognitive flexibility in autism: How task predictability and sex influence performances.自闭症中的认知灵活性:任务可预测性和性别如何影响表现。
Autism Res. 2025 Feb;18(2):281-294. doi: 10.1002/aur.3281. Epub 2024 Dec 5.
2
Inhibition of cued but not executed task sets depends on cue-task compatibility and practice.提示但未执行的任务集的抑制取决于提示-任务的兼容性和练习。
Psychol Res. 2024 Oct;88(7):2036-2058. doi: 10.1007/s00426-024-02013-z. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
3
Insights into control over cognitive flexibility from studies of task-switching.

本文引用的文献

1
Conflict adaptation: it is not what you expect.冲突适应:并非你所预期的那样。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(10):1993-2007. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.676655. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
2
It is not what you expect: dissociating conflict adaptation from expectancies in a Stroop task.事与愿违:在 Stroop 任务中,冲突适应与预期脱钩。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Feb;39(1):271-84. doi: 10.1037/a0027734. Epub 2012 Mar 19.
3
Olfactory predictive codes and stimulus templates in piriform cortex.嗅球皮层中的嗅觉预测代码和刺激模板。
从任务转换研究中洞察对认知灵活性的控制
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2024 Feb;55. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2023.101342. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
4
Task sets define boundaries of learned cognitive flexibility in list-wide proportion switch manipulations.任务集在广泛的比例切换操作中定义了习得认知灵活性的界限。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2023 Aug;49(8):1111-1122. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001138. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
5
Neural Dynamics of Context-sensitive Adjustments in Cognitive Flexibility.神经动力学视角下认知灵活性的情境敏感性调整。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2022 Feb 1;34(3):480-494. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01813.
6
Time-based task expectancy: perceptual task indicator expectancy or expectancy of post-perceptual task components?基于时间的任务预期:感知任务指标预期还是感知后任务成分预期?
Psychol Res. 2022 Jul;86(5):1665-1682. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01588-1. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
7
Minimal impact of consolidation on learned switch-readiness.巩固对习得的转换准备影响最小。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2021 Oct;47(10):1622-1637. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001074. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
8
The Effects of 10 Hz Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on Audiovisual Task Switching.10赫兹经颅交流电刺激对视听任务转换的影响
Front Neurosci. 2018 Feb 13;12:67. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00067. eCollection 2018.
9
Guessing versus Choosing an Upcoming Task.猜测与选择即将到来的任务。
Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 22;7:396. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00396. eCollection 2016.
10
Creatures of habit (and control): a multi-level learning perspective on the modulation of congruency effects.习惯(与控制)的产物:关于一致性效应调节的多层次学习视角
Front Psychol. 2014 Nov 6;5:1247. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01247. eCollection 2014.
Neuron. 2011 Oct 6;72(1):178-87. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.08.010.
4
Medial prefrontal cortex as an action-outcome predictor.内侧前额叶皮层作为行为-结果预测器。
Nat Neurosci. 2011 Sep 18;14(10):1338-44. doi: 10.1038/nn.2921.
5
Value and prediction error in medial frontal cortex: integrating the single-unit and systems levels of analysis.内侧前额叶皮层的价值和预测误差:整合单一单元和系统分析水平。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2011 Aug 3;5:75. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00075. eCollection 2011.
6
Cue-switch effects do not rely on the same neural systems as task-switch effects.线索转换效应并不依赖于与任务转换效应相同的神经机制。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2011 Dec;11(4):600-7. doi: 10.3758/s13415-011-0055-9.
7
Advance preparation in task-switching: converging evidence from behavioral, brain activation, and model-based approaches.任务转换中的预先准备:来自行为、大脑激活和基于模型方法的综合证据。
Front Psychol. 2010 Jul 15;1:25. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00025. eCollection 2010.
8
Predictive coding and pitch processing in the auditory cortex.听觉皮层中的预测编码和音高处理。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Oct;23(10):3084-94. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00021. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
9
Challenging a decade of brain research on task switching: brain activation in the task-switching paradigm reflects adaptation rather than reconfiguration of task sets.对十年来任务切换的大脑研究提出挑战:任务切换范式中的大脑激活反映的是任务集的适应而非重新配置。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2012 Mar;33(3):639-51. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21234. Epub 2011 Mar 9.
10
Task-switching performance with 1:1 and 2:1 cue-task mappings: not so different after all.1:1 和 2:1 线索-任务映射下的任务转换性能:毕竟没有那么不同。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Mar;37(2):405-15. doi: 10.1037/a0021967.