Arizona Respiratory Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012 Oct;12(5):461-6. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0b013e328357a3bc.
Multiple studies have shown that the prevalence of asthma and atopy is reduced in children raised on traditional dairy farms. This article discusses the temporal constraints for the protective farm effect, the components of a farming environment that are associated with protection, and novel mechanisms that may underlie protection from asthma and atopy in farming populations.
Protection from asthma and allergy is strongest when exposure occurs in utero or early in life, but the protective effects can persist into adulthood. Just three exposures (contact with cows and straw and consumption of unprocessed cow's milk) account for virtually all the protective farm effect for asthma but not atopy. Whey proteins appear to be critical for the protective effects of farm milk, whereas the high microbial diversity existing in a farm environment is strongly and inversely associated with asthma, but only weakly associated with atopy. Therefore, distinct mechanisms are likely to mediate protection from asthma and atopy. The biological significance of microbial diversity is still unclear, but multiple lines of evidence link the asthma-protective and allergy-protective effects of farming to immune responses and the microbiome. Work in mouse models is revealing novel cellular and molecular mechanisms through which the microbiota may modulate immune responses and allergic inflammation, and thus contribute to the farm effect. The role of the host's genetic makeup, on the contrary, remains poorly understood.
The discovery of the central role played by microbial diversity in the asthma-protective and allergy-protective effects of farming warrants metagenomic studies that concertedly and longitudinally investigate the microbiome, the genome, and the immune system of farmers and the farms they live on.
多项研究表明,在传统奶牛场饲养的儿童中,哮喘和过敏的患病率较低。本文讨论了保护性农场效应的时间限制、与保护相关的农场环境成分,以及可能是农业人群中预防哮喘和过敏的潜在机制。
在子宫内或生命早期接触时,哮喘和过敏的保护作用最强,但保护作用可持续到成年期。仅三次接触(接触奶牛和稻草以及食用未加工的牛奶)几乎可以解释哮喘的所有保护性农场效应,但不能解释过敏。乳清蛋白似乎对农场牛奶的保护作用至关重要,而农场环境中存在的高度微生物多样性与哮喘强烈负相关,但与过敏相关性很弱。因此,可能存在不同的机制来介导对哮喘和过敏的保护。微生物多样性的生物学意义仍不清楚,但有多种证据表明,农业对哮喘和过敏的保护作用与免疫反应和微生物组有关。在小鼠模型中的研究揭示了微生物群可能调节免疫反应和过敏炎症的新的细胞和分子机制,并因此有助于发挥农场效应。相反,宿主遗传构成的作用仍知之甚少。
微生物多样性在农业对哮喘和过敏的保护作用中起着核心作用,这一发现证明需要进行宏基因组研究,这些研究需要协同且纵向地研究农民及其居住农场的微生物组、基因组和免疫系统。