• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

获得年龄效应在延迟图片命名任务中的作用。

Age-of-acquisition effects in delayed picture-naming tasks.

机构信息

DPSS, University of Padua, Via Venezia 8, 35131 Padova, Italy.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Feb;20(1):148-53. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0310-2.

DOI:10.3758/s13423-012-0310-2
PMID:22893113
Abstract

We report two experiments that explored the linguistic locus of age-of-acquisition effects in picture naming by using a delayed naming task that involved only a low proportion of trials (25 %) while, for the large majority of the trials (75 %), participants performed another task-that is, the prevalent task. The prevalent tasks were semantic categorization in Experiment 1a and grammatical-gender decision in Experiments 1b and 2. In Experiment 1a, in which participants were biased to retrieve semantic information in order to perform the semantic categorization task, delayed naming times were affected by age of acquisition, reflecting a postsemantic locus of the effect. In Experiments 1b and 2, in which participants were biased to retrieve lexical information in order to perform the grammatical gender decision task, there was also an age-of-acquisition effect. These results suggest that part of the age-of-acquisition effect in picture naming occurs at the level at which the phonological properties of words are retrieved.

摘要

我们报告了两项实验,通过使用仅涉及一小部分试验(25%)的延迟命名任务,探索了图片命名中习得年龄效应的语言位置,而对于绝大多数试验(75%),参与者执行了另一项任务——即主流任务。主流任务在实验 1a 中是语义分类,在实验 1b 和 2 中是语法性别决策。在实验 1a 中,参与者为了执行语义分类任务而偏向于检索语义信息,延迟命名时间受到习得年龄的影响,反映了该效应的后语义位置。在实验 1b 和 2 中,参与者为了执行语法性别决策任务而偏向于检索词汇信息,也存在习得年龄效应。这些结果表明,图片命名中习得年龄效应的一部分发生在检索单词的语音属性的水平上。

相似文献

1
Age-of-acquisition effects in delayed picture-naming tasks.获得年龄效应在延迟图片命名任务中的作用。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Feb;20(1):148-53. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0310-2.
2
Distractor modality can turn semantic interference into semantic facilitation in the picture-word interference task: implications for theories of lexical access in speech production.干扰模态可在图片-词汇干扰任务中将语义干扰转化为语义促进:对言语产生中词汇通达理论的启示。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Nov;35(6):1443-53. doi: 10.1037/a0017020.
3
Is there semantic interference in delayed naming?延迟命名是否存在语义干扰?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Mar;37(2):522-38. doi: 10.1037/a0021970.
4
Dual-tasking with simple linguistic tasks: Evidence for serial processing.与简单语言任务的双重任务处理:串行处理的证据。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Nov;191:131-148. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.09.006. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
5
Semantic interference in the picture-word interference task: Is there a pre-lexical, conceptual contribution to the effect?图片词汇干扰任务中的语义干扰:这种效应是否存在词汇前、概念性的贡献?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Apr;27(2):373-378. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01667-w.
6
Does bilingualism hamper lexical access in speech production?双语能力会妨碍言语产生中的词汇提取吗?
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Feb;127(2):277-88. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.06.003. Epub 2007 Jul 26.
7
Semantic facilitation in blocked picture categorization: Some data and considerations regarding task selection.在受阻图片分类中的语义促进:关于任务选择的一些数据和考虑。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2024 May;50(5):515-530. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001203. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
8
Top-down influences on lexical selection during spoken word production: A 4T fMRI investigation of refractory effects in picture naming.口语产生过程中自上而下对词汇选择的影响:一项关于图片命名中不应期效应的4T功能磁共振成像研究。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2006 Nov;27(11):864-73. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20227.
9
Are age-of-acquisition effects on object naming due simply to differences in object recognition? Comments on levelt (2002).习得年龄对物体命名的影响仅仅是由于物体识别方面的差异吗?对莱尔特(2002年)的评论。
Mem Cognit. 2006 Jul;34(5):1172-82. doi: 10.3758/bf03193263.
10
Picture naming and verbal fluency in children with cochlear implants.人工耳蜗植入儿童的图片命名和言语流畅性
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014 Oct;57(5):1870-82. doi: 10.1044/2014_JSLHR-L-13-0321.

引用本文的文献

1
Action and object picture naming in Turkish: A psycholinguistic database.土耳其语中的动作和物体图片命名:一个心理语言学数据库。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Jul 15;57(8):225. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02764-6.
2
Predicting confrontation naming item difficulty.预测对答命名项目的难度。
Aphasiology. 2019;33(6):689-709. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2018.1495310. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
3
Italian Age of Acquisition Norms for a Large Set of Words (ItAoA).大量词汇的意大利语习得年龄规范(ItAoA)。

本文引用的文献

1
The distractor picture paradox in speech production: evidence from the word translation task.
J Psycholinguist Res. 2009 Dec;38(6):527-47. doi: 10.1007/s10936-009-9119-1. Epub 2009 May 29.
2
Where is the effect of frequency in word production? Insights from aphasic picture-naming errors.频率在词汇生成中的作用体现在哪里?来自失语症患者图片命名错误的见解。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2008 Jun;25(4):463-92. doi: 10.1080/02643290701674851.
3
The varying effects of age of acquisition.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Jan;62(1):50-62. doi: 10.1080/17470210701814352.
4
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 13;10:278. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00278. eCollection 2019.
4
Norms for a Pictographic System: The Aragonese Portal of Augmentative/Alternative Communication (ARASAAC) System.象形符号系统规范:阿拉贡辅助/替代沟通门户网站(ARASAAC)系统
Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 14;9:2538. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02538. eCollection 2018.
5
A normative study for photographs of celebrities in Spain.西班牙名人照片的规范性研究。
PLoS One. 2018 May 16;13(5):e0197554. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197554. eCollection 2018.
6
First learned words are not forgotten: Age-of-acquisition effects in the tip-of-the-tongue experience.最先学会的单词不会被遗忘:舌尖现象中的习得年龄效应。
Mem Cognit. 2015 Oct;43(7):1085-103. doi: 10.3758/s13421-015-0525-3.
7
Tracking the time course of multi-word noun phrase production with ERPs or on when (and why) cat is faster than the big cat.利用事件相关电位追踪多词名词短语生成的时间进程,或者探讨“猫”比“大猫”更快(以及为何更快)的时间点(和原因)。
Front Psychol. 2014 Jul 1;5:586. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00586. eCollection 2014.
Age of acquisition, not word frequency affects object recognition: evidence from the effects of visual degradation.习得年龄而非词频影响物体识别:来自视觉退化效应的证据。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Sep;129(1):130-7. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.05.005. Epub 2008 Jul 2.
5
The locus of the frequency effect in picture naming: when recognizing is not enough.图片命名中频率效应的轨迹:当识别不足时。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Dec;14(6):1177-82. doi: 10.3758/bf03193109.
6
Are age-of-acquisition effects on object naming due simply to differences in object recognition? Comments on levelt (2002).习得年龄对物体命名的影响仅仅是由于物体识别方面的差异吗?对莱尔特(2002年)的评论。
Mem Cognit. 2006 Jul;34(5):1172-82. doi: 10.3758/bf03193263.
7
Does word frequency affect lexical selection in speech production?词频会影响言语产生中的词汇选择吗?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2006 Oct;59(10):1681-90. doi: 10.1080/17470210600750558.
8
Age of acquisition effects in the semantic processing of pictures.图片语义加工中的习得年龄效应
Mem Cognit. 2005 Jul;33(5):905-12. doi: 10.3758/bf03193084.
9
Age of acquisition effects in picture naming: evidence for a lexical-semantic competition hypothesis.图片命名中的习得年龄效应:词汇语义竞争假说的证据。
Cognition. 2005 Jun;96(2):B45-54. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.11.006. Epub 2005 Jan 25.
10
Word naming times and psycholinguistic norms for Italian nouns.意大利语名词的单词命名时间和心理语言学规范。
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2002 Aug;34(3):424-34. doi: 10.3758/bf03195471.