• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大量词汇的意大利语习得年龄规范(ItAoA)。

Italian Age of Acquisition Norms for a Large Set of Words (ItAoA).

作者信息

Montefinese Maria, Vinson David, Vigliocco Gabriella, Ambrosini Ettore

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Department of General Psychology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 13;10:278. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00278. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00278
PMID:30814969
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6381031/
Abstract

Age of acquisition (AoA) is an important psycholinguistic variable that affects the performance of healthy individuals and patients in a large variety of cognitive tasks. For this reason, it becomes more and more compelling to collect new AoA norms for a large set of stimuli in order to allow better control and manipulation of AoA in future research. An important motivation of the present study is to extend previous Italian norms by collecting AoA ratings for a much larger range of Italian words for which concreteness and semantic-affective norms are now available thus ensuring greater coverage of words varying along these dimensions. In the present study, we collected AoA ratings for 1,957 Italian content words (adjectives, nouns, and verbs), by asking healthy adult participants to estimate the age at which they thought they had learned the word in a Web survey procedure. First, we found high split-half correlation within our sample, suggesting strong internal reliability. Second, our data indicate that the ratings collected in this study are as valid and reliable as those collected in previous studies for Italian across different age populations (adult and children) and other languages. Finally, we analyzed the relation between AoA ratings and other lexical-semantic variables (e.g., word frequency, imageability, valence, arousal) and showed that these correlations were generally consistent with the correlations reported in other normative studies for Italian and other languages. Therefore, our new AoA norms are a valuable source of information for future research in the Italian language. The full database is available at the Open Science Framework (osf.io/3trg2).

摘要

习得年龄(AoA)是一个重要的心理语言学变量,它会影响健康个体和患者在各类认知任务中的表现。因此,为大量刺激收集新的AoA常模变得越来越迫切,以便在未来研究中更好地控制和操纵AoA。本研究的一个重要动机是扩展先前的意大利语常模,通过收集更多意大利语单词的AoA评级,目前这些单词的具体性和语义情感常模已可用,从而确保在这些维度上变化的单词有更大的覆盖范围。在本研究中,我们通过要求健康的成年参与者在网络调查程序中估计他们认为自己学会该单词的年龄,收集了1957个意大利语实词(形容词、名词和动词)的AoA评级。首先,我们在样本中发现了较高的分半相关性,表明内部可靠性很强。其次,我们的数据表明,本研究收集的评级与先前针对不同年龄人群(成人和儿童)的意大利语及其他语言研究中收集的评级一样有效和可靠。最后,我们分析了AoA评级与其他词汇语义变量(如词频、可想象性、效价、唤醒度)之间的关系,结果表明这些相关性通常与意大利语和其他语言的其他规范性研究报告的相关性一致。因此,我们新的AoA常模是意大利语未来研究的宝贵信息来源。完整数据库可在开放科学框架(osf.io/3trg2)获取。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4755/6381031/ff72ebf5e82c/fpsyg-10-00278-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4755/6381031/dacd5d6aeefa/fpsyg-10-00278-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4755/6381031/ff72ebf5e82c/fpsyg-10-00278-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4755/6381031/dacd5d6aeefa/fpsyg-10-00278-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4755/6381031/ff72ebf5e82c/fpsyg-10-00278-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Italian Age of Acquisition Norms for a Large Set of Words (ItAoA).大量词汇的意大利语习得年龄规范(ItAoA)。
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 13;10:278. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00278. eCollection 2019.
2
CONcreTEXT norms: Concreteness ratings for Italian and English words in context.CONcreTEXT 规范:语境中意大利语和英语单词的具体性评级。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 20;18(10):e0293031. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293031. eCollection 2023.
3
Age-of-acquisition norms for a set of 1,749 Portuguese words.一组 1749 个葡萄牙语单词的习得年龄规范。
Behav Res Methods. 2010 May;42(2):474-80. doi: 10.3758/BRM.42.2.474.
4
Ratings of age of acquisition of 299 words across 25 languages: Is there a cross-linguistic order of words?25种语言中299个单词的习得年龄评级:是否存在跨语言的词汇顺序?
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Sep;48(3):1154-77. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0636-6.
5
Estimated age of acquisition norms for 834 Portuguese nouns and their relation with other psycholinguistic variables.834个葡萄牙语名词的习得规范估计年龄及其与其他心理语言学变量的关系。
Behav Res Methods. 2007 Aug;39(3):439-44. doi: 10.3758/bf03193013.
6
Hong Kong Chinese character psycholinguistic norms: ratings of 4376 single Chinese characters on semantic radical transparency, age-of-acquisition, familiarity, imageability, and concreteness.香港汉字心理语言学规范:4376 个单汉字在语义透明度、习得年龄、熟悉度、形象度和具体度上的评级。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Sep;55(6):2989-3008. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01928-y. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
7
Rated age-of-acquisition norms for over 3,200 German words.3200多个德语单词的习得年龄常模。
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Apr;49(2):484-501. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0718-0.
8
The Croatian psycholinguistic database: Estimates for 6000 nouns, verbs, adjectives and adverbs.克罗地亚心理语言学数据库:6000 个名词、动词、形容词和副词的估计值。
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Aug;53(4):1799-1816. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01533-x. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
9
The adaptation of the Affective Norms for English Words (ANEW) for Italian.情感词效价评定量表(ANEW)的意大利语适应性研究。
Behav Res Methods. 2014 Sep;46(3):887-903. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0405-3.
10
Lexicosemantic, affective, and distributional norms for 1,000 Dutch adjectives.荷兰语 1000 个形容词的词汇语义、情感和分布规范。
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Jun;52(3):1108-1121. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01303-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring semantic and executive flexibility interplay in task switching.探索任务切换中语义和执行灵活性的相互作用。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 27;15(1):31609. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-09639-y.
2
Fine-Grained Concreteness Effects on Word Processing and Representation Across Three Tasks: An ERP Study.三项任务中细粒度具体性对词汇加工与表征的影响:一项事件相关电位研究
Psychophysiology. 2025 May;62(5):e70074. doi: 10.1111/psyp.70074.
3
Quantifying the Multidimensionality of Abstract Concepts: An Italian Database.量化抽象概念的多维度性:一个意大利语数据库。

本文引用的文献

1
The psycholinguistic and affective structure of words conveying pain.传达疼痛的词语的心理语言学和情感结构。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 29;13(6):e0199658. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199658. eCollection 2018.
2
No grammatical gender effect on affective ratings: evidence from Italian and German languages.语法性对情感评分无影响:来自意大利语和德语的证据。
Cogn Emot. 2019 Jun;33(4):848-854. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2018.1483322. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
3
Equivalence Tests: A Practical Primer for Tests, Correlations, and Meta-Analyses.等效性检验:检验、相关性及荟萃分析实用入门指南
Brain Sci. 2025 Feb 21;15(3):222. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15030222.
4
The Italian Crowdsourcing Project: Visual word recognition times for 130,495 Italian words.意大利众包项目:130495个意大利语单词的视觉单词识别时间
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec 28;57(1):26. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02548-4.
5
Lexical innovations are rarely passed on during one's lifetime: Epidemiological perspectives on estimating the basic reproductive ratio of words.词汇创新在一个人的一生中很少会传承下去:关于估计词汇基本繁殖率的流行病学观点。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 5;19(12):e0312336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312336. eCollection 2024.
6
Specificity ratings for English data.英文数据的特异性评级。
Cogn Process. 2025 May;26(2):283-302. doi: 10.1007/s10339-024-01239-4. Epub 2024 Nov 8.
7
What we mean when we say semantic: Toward a multidisciplinary semantic glossary.我们所说的语义是什么意思:迈向一个多学科语义词汇表。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Feb;32(1):243-280. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02556-7. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
8
Age of Acquisition of Personality Terms: Implications for Personality Theory.人格术语习得年龄:对人格理论的启示
Eur J Psychol. 2022 May 31;18(2):132-141. doi: 10.5964/ejop.2987. eCollection 2022 May.
9
Specificity ratings for Italian data.意大利数据的特异性评分。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Oct;55(7):3531-3548. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01974-6. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
10
The Croatian psycholinguistic database: Estimates for 6000 nouns, verbs, adjectives and adverbs.克罗地亚心理语言学数据库:6000 个名词、动词、形容词和副词的估计值。
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Aug;53(4):1799-1816. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01533-x. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2017 May;8(4):355-362. doi: 10.1177/1948550617697177. Epub 2017 May 5.
4
Affective Norms for Italian Words in Older Adults: Age Differences in Ratings of Valence, Arousal and Dominance.老年人意大利语词汇的情感规范:效价、唤醒和支配评级中的年龄差异
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 3;12(1):e0169472. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169472. eCollection 2017.
5
Test-based age-of-acquisition norms for 44 thousand English word meanings.基于测试的44000个英语词义的习得年龄规范。
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Aug;49(4):1520-1523. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0811-4.
6
Age of acquisition ratings score better on criterion validity than frequency trajectory or ratings "corrected" for frequency.习得年龄评分在效标效度方面比频率轨迹或针对频率“校正”的评分表现更好。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Jul;70(7):1129-1139. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1172097. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
7
What is the right place for atypical exemplars? Commentary: The right hemisphere contribution to semantic categorization: a TMS study.非典型范例的正确位置在哪里?评论:右半球对语义分类的贡献:一项经颅磁刺激研究。
Front Psychol. 2015 Sep 8;6:1349. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01349. eCollection 2015.
8
Ratings of age of acquisition of 299 words across 25 languages: Is there a cross-linguistic order of words?25种语言中299个单词的习得年龄评级:是否存在跨语言的词汇顺序?
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Sep;48(3):1154-77. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0636-6.
9
First learned words are not forgotten: Age-of-acquisition effects in the tip-of-the-tongue experience.最先学会的单词不会被遗忘:舌尖现象中的习得年龄效应。
Mem Cognit. 2015 Oct;43(7):1085-103. doi: 10.3758/s13421-015-0525-3.
10
Can the humped animal's knee conceal its name? Commentary on: "The roles of shared vs. distinctive conceptual features in lexical access".有驼峰的动物的膝盖能隐藏它的名字吗?对《词汇通达中共享概念特征与独特概念特征的作用》的评论
Front Psychol. 2015 Apr 10;6:418. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00418. eCollection 2015.