Burn John, Mathers John, Bishop D Tim
Institute of genetic medicine, Centre for Life Central Parkway, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Recent Results Cancer Res. 2013;191:157-83. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-30331-9_9.
Hereditary forms of colorectal cancer account for less than 5 % of colorectal cancer but attract disproportionate attention because they offer an opportunity for effective surgical prophylaxis, influence the health of the wider family and give insight into the critical pathways of carcinogenesis. Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP) due to loss of the APC gene and Lynch syndrome or Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colon Cancer (HNPCC) due to breakdown in MisMatch Repair are the principal syndromes of broader interest and both have been the subject of chemoprevention trials. There has been a longstanding interest in non-steroidal anti inflammatories in FAP where trials have shown regression of polyps with the "pro drug"sulindac and the selective COX2 inhibitors though impact on long-term cancer risk is not confirmed. The CAPP1 trial focused on two interventions in a factorial design, aspirin and resistant starch or fermentable fibre. Resistant starch is not absorbed in the small intestine and undergoes colonic fermentation to short-chain fatty acids including butyrate which have anti-cancer effects. Polyposis registry clinicians across Europe recruited adolescents with FAP to receive aspirin (600 mg as 2 tablets/d) and/or 30 g as 2 sachets/d in a 1:1 blend of potato starch and high amylose maize starch [Hylon VII]) with placebo control for at least a year or until surgery before age 21. Fifty-nine percent (133/227) of recruits had a baseline and at least one other endoscopy. After a median of 17 months , the primary endpoint of a risk of an increased polyp number in the rectum and sigmoid colon was not significantly reduced in either treatment group with relative risks of 0.77 (aspirin; 95 % CI, 0.54-1.10;) and 1.05 (RS; 95 % CI, 0.73-1.49. The diameter of the largest polyp detected tended to be smaller in the aspirin arm. The planned subgroup analyses of patients who elected to continue on study for more than one year found a significant reduction in the size of the largest polyp in the aspirin versus non-aspirin group (p = 0.02), Mean crypt length decreased significantly over time on study in the two combined RS groups, compared with the two combined non-RS groups (p < 0.0001 for interaction), in a model of the interaction between intervention and time. In CAPP2, 1009 Lynch syndrome gene carriers were recruited from 43 international centres. 937 commenced intervention: 600 mg enteric coated aspirin and/or 30grams of the resistant starch Novelose in a 2 by 2 factorial placebo controlled design. After a mean of 29 months, intervention, there was no evidence that either agent influenced development of colonic neoplasia. However, the design included double blind follow-up for at least 10 years. After a mean of 55.7 months, and despite regular colonoscopy and polyp removal, 48 recruits developed CRC. Of these, 18 received aspirin and 30 received AP; the HR for CRC for aspirin was 0.63 (CI 0.35-1.13, p = 0.12). Five of the 48 people who developed CRC each had two primary colon cancers. Poisson regression analysis to allow for multiple primary events indicated a protective effect: IRR 0.56 (CI 0.32-0.99, p = 0.05). For those who took aspirin (or AP) for a minimum of 2 years (per protocol) the HR was 0.41 (CI 0.19-0.86 p = 0.02) and the IRR, 0.37 (CI 0.18-0.78 p = 0.008). Combined analysis of all LS cancers including CRC revealed a similar effect. On intention to treat analysis, the HR was 0.65 (CI 0.42-1.00, p = 0.05 and IRR was 0.59 (CI 0.39-0.90 p = 0.01), while the Per Protocol analysis HR was 0.45 (CI 0.26-0.79 p = 0.005,) and IRR was 0.42 (CI 0.25-0.72, p = 0.001). Adverse events in the aspirin and placebo groups were similar with 11 significant gastrointestinal bleeds or ulcers in the aspirin group and 9 in the placebo group. The evidence is now sufficient to recommend aspirin to all Lynch syndrome gene carriers. CAPP3 will recruit 3000 gene carriers into a dose inferiority study to test the relative benefits of 100mg, 300 or 600mg daily doses.
遗传性结直肠癌占结直肠癌病例的比例不到5%,但却备受关注,因为它们为有效的手术预防提供了机会,影响着更广泛家庭成员的健康,还能让人们深入了解致癌的关键途径。因APC基因缺失导致的家族性腺瘤性息肉病(FAP)以及因错配修复功能缺陷导致的林奇综合征或遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌(HNPCC)是更受关注的主要综合征,二者均已成为化学预防试验的研究对象。长期以来,人们一直对FAP中的非甾体抗炎药感兴趣,试验表明,“前体药物”舒林酸和选择性COX2抑制剂可使息肉消退,不过其对长期癌症风险的影响尚未得到证实。CAPP1试验采用析因设计,重点研究了两种干预措施,即阿司匹林与抗性淀粉或可发酵纤维。抗性淀粉在小肠中不被吸收,会在结肠中发酵生成包括丁酸在内的短链脂肪酸,这些短链脂肪酸具有抗癌作用。欧洲各地息肉病登记处的临床医生招募了患有FAP的青少年,让他们接受阿司匹林(600毫克,每日2片)和/或30克(每日2包,由马铃薯淀粉和高直链玉米淀粉[Hylon VII]按1:1混合而成),并设置安慰剂对照组,至少持续一年,或直至21岁前接受手术。59%(133/227)的受试者进行了基线检查以及至少一次其他内镜检查。中位随访17个月后,两个治疗组中直肠和乙状结肠息肉数量增加风险的主要终点均未显著降低,阿司匹林组的相对风险为0.77(95%CI,0.54 - 1.10),抗性淀粉组为1.05(95%CI,0.73 - 1.49)。阿司匹林组检测到的最大息肉直径往往较小。对选择继续研究一年以上的患者进行的计划亚组分析发现,阿司匹林组与非阿司匹林组相比,最大息肉尺寸显著减小(p = 0.02)。在干预与时间相互作用的模型中,与两个非抗性淀粉联合组相比,两个抗性淀粉联合组在研究期间平均隐窝长度随时间显著下降(交互作用p < 0.0001)。在CAPP-2试验中,从43个国际中心招募了1009名林奇综合征基因携带者。937人开始干预:采用2×2析因安慰剂对照设计,服用600毫克肠溶阿司匹林和/或30克抗性淀粉Novelose。平均干预29个月后,没有证据表明任何一种药物会影响结肠肿瘤的发生。不过,该设计包括至少10年的双盲随访。平均随访55.7个月后,尽管定期进行结肠镜检查并切除息肉,仍有48名受试者发生了结直肠癌。其中,18人服用了阿司匹林,30人服用了抗性淀粉;阿司匹林组结直肠癌的风险比为0.63(CI 0.35 - 1.13,p = 0.12)。48名发生结直肠癌的受试者中有5人各自患有两处原发性结肠癌。采用泊松回归分析以考虑多个原发性事件,结果显示有保护作用:发病率比为0.56(CI 0.32 - 0.99,p = 0.05)。对于那些至少服用2年阿司匹林(或抗性淀粉)的受试者(按方案分析),风险比为0.41(CI 0.19 - 0.86,p = 0.02),发病率比为0.37(CI 0.18 - 0.78,p = 0.008)。对包括结直肠癌在内的所有林奇综合征相关癌症进行的综合分析显示了类似的效果。在意向性分析中,风险比为0.65(CI 0.42 - 1.00,p = 0.05),发病率比为0.59(CI 0.39 - 0.90,p = 0.01),而按方案分析的风险比为0.45(CI 0.26 - 0.79,p = 0.005),发病率比为0.42(CI 0.25 - 0.72,p = 0.001)。阿司匹林组和安慰剂组的不良事件相似,阿司匹林组有11例严重胃肠道出血或溃疡,安慰剂组有9例。现在有足够的证据向所有林奇综合征基因携带者推荐使用阿司匹林。CAPP3将招募3000名基因携带者参与一项剂量劣势研究,以测试每日100毫克、300毫克或600毫克剂量的相对益处。