Nephrology Section, 0K12, Department of Internal Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Int Urol Nephrol. 2013 Feb;45(1):139-50. doi: 10.1007/s11255-012-0258-1. Epub 2012 Aug 15.
In the last decade, uremic toxicity as a potential cause for the excess of cardiovascular disease and mortality observed in chronic kidney disease gained more and more interest. This review focuses on uremic toxins with known cardiovascular effects and their removal. For protein-bound solutes, for example, indoxylsulfate and the conjugates of p-cresol, and for small water-soluble solutes, for example, guanidines, such as ADMA and SDMA, there is a growing evidence for a role in cardiovascular toxicity in vitro (e.g., affecting leukocyte, endothelial, vascular smooth muscle cell function) and/or in vivo. Several middle molecules (e.g., beta-2-microglobulin, interleukin-6, TNF-alpha and FGF-23) were shown to be predictors for cardiovascular disease and/or mortality. Most of these solutes, however, are difficult to remove during dialysis, which is traditionally assessed by studying the removal of urea, which can be considered as a relatively inert uremic retention solute. However, even the effective removal of other small water-soluble toxins than urea can be hampered by their larger distribution volumes. Middle molecules (beta-2-microglobulin as prototype, but not necessarily representative for others) are cleared more efficiently when the pore size of the dialyzer membrane increases, convection is applied and dialysis time is prolonged. Only adding convection to diffusion improves the removal of protein-bound toxins. Therefore, alternative removal strategies, such as intestinal adsorption, drugs interfering with toxic biochemical pathways or decreasing toxin concentration, and extracorporeal plasma adsorption, as well as kinetic behavior during dialysis need further investigation. Even more importantly, randomized clinical studies are required to demonstrate a survival advantage through these strategies.
在过去的十年中,尿毒症毒素作为慢性肾脏病患者心血管疾病和死亡率过高的潜在原因引起了越来越多的关注。本篇综述重点关注具有已知心血管作用的尿毒症毒素及其清除方法。对于蛋白结合溶质,例如吲哚硫酸酯和对甲酚的结合物,以及对于小的水溶性溶质,例如胍类,如 ADMA 和 SDMA,越来越多的证据表明它们在体外(例如,影响白细胞、内皮细胞、血管平滑肌细胞功能)和/或体内具有心血管毒性作用。一些中分子(例如,β-2-微球蛋白、白细胞介素-6、TNF-α和 FGF-23)被证明是心血管疾病和/或死亡率的预测因子。然而,这些溶质中的大多数在透析期间难以去除,传统上通过研究尿素的去除来评估,尿素可被视为相对惰性的尿毒症保留溶质。然而,即使有效去除其他比尿素更小的水溶性毒素,也可能会受到其更大分布体积的阻碍。当中分子(以β-2-微球蛋白为原型,但不一定代表其他分子)的孔径增大、应用对流和延长透析时间时,清除效率更高。仅增加对流可提高蛋白结合毒素的清除率。因此,需要进一步研究替代清除策略,例如肠道吸附、干扰毒性生化途径或降低毒素浓度的药物以及体外血浆吸附,以及透析过程中的动力学行为。更重要的是,需要进行随机临床试验来证明这些策略具有生存优势。