The Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Charleston, South Carolina 29425, USA.
Bull World Health Organ. 2012 Aug 1;90(8):613-622A. doi: 10.2471/BLT.11.094268. Epub 2012 May 29.
To examine the relationship between condom social marketing programmes and condom use.
Standard systematic review and meta-analysis methods were followed. The review included studies of interventions in which condoms were sold, in which a local brand name(s) was developed for condoms, and in which condoms were marketed through a promotional campaign to increase sales. A definition of intervention was developed and standard inclusion criteria were followed in selecting studies. Data were extracted from each eligible study, and a meta-analysis of the results was carried out.
Six studies with a combined sample size of 23,048 met the inclusion criteria. One was conducted in India and five in sub-Saharan Africa. All studies were cross-sectional or serial cross-sectional. Three studies had a comparison group, although all lacked equivalence in sociodemographic characteristics across study arms. All studies randomly selected participants for assessments, although none randomly assigned participants to intervention arms. The random-effects pooled odds ratio for condom use was 2.01 (95% confidence interval, CI: 1.42-2.84) for the most recent sexual encounter and 2.10 (95% CI: 1.51-2.91) for a composite of all condom use outcomes. Tests for heterogeneity yielded significant results for both meta-analyses.
The evidence base for the effect of condom social marketing on condom use is small because few rigorous studies have been conducted. Meta-analyses showed a positive and statistically significant effect on increasing condom use, and all individual studies showed positive trends. The cumulative effect of condom social marketing over multiple years could be substantial. We strongly encourage more evaluations of these programmes with study designs of high rigour.
研究 condom 社会营销计划与 condom 使用之间的关系。
采用标准系统评价和荟萃分析方法。综述纳入 condom 销售干预、开发 condom 当地品牌名称和促销活动增加 condom 销售的干预研究。制定了干预措施的定义,并遵循了标准纳入标准来选择研究。从每个合格研究中提取数据,并对结果进行荟萃分析。
符合纳入标准的有 6 项研究,总样本量为 23048 人。其中 1 项在印度进行,5 项在撒哈拉以南非洲进行。所有研究均为横断面或系列横断面研究。有 3 项研究有对照组,尽管所有研究在研究组之间的社会人口特征方面都没有可比性。所有研究都对参与者进行了随机评估,尽管没有将参与者随机分配到干预组。最近一次性行为的 condom 使用的随机效应合并优势比为 2.01(95%置信区间,CI:1.42-2.84),所有 condom 使用结果的综合优势比为 2.10(95%CI:1.51-2.91)。荟萃分析结果显示,两种分析的异质性检验均有显著结果。
由于进行了严格研究的数量较少,因此 condom 社会营销对 condom 使用的影响的证据基础很小。荟萃分析显示,增加 condom 使用的效果呈阳性且具有统计学意义,所有单独的研究都显示出积极的趋势。多年来 condom 社会营销的累积效应可能很大。我们强烈鼓励对这些计划进行更多具有高严谨性设计的评估。