Rossen Janne, Lucovnik Miha, Eggebø Torbjørn Moe, Tul Natasa, Murphy Martina, Vistad Ingvild, Robson Michael
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sørlandet Hospital HF Kristiansand, Kristiansand, Norway.
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Children's and Women's Health, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 12;7(7):e016192. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016192.
Internationally, the 10-Group Classification System (TGCS) has been used to report caesarean section rates, but analysis of other outcomes is also recommended. We now aim to present the TGCS as a method to assess outcomes of labour and delivery using routine collection of perinatal information.
This research is a methodological study to describe the use of the TGCS.
Stavanger University Hospital (SUH), Norway, National Maternity Hospital Dublin, Ireland and Slovenian National Perinatal Database (SLO), Slovenia.
9848 women from SUH, Norway, 9250 women from National Maternity Hospital Dublin, Ireland and 106 167 women, from SLO, Slovenia.
All women were classified according to the TGCS within which caesarean section, oxytocin augmentation, epidural analgesia, operative vaginal deliveries, episiotomy, sphincter rupture, postpartum haemorrhage, blood transfusion, maternal age >35 years, body mass index >30, Apgar score, umbilical cord pH, hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy, antepartum and perinatal deaths were incorporated.
There were significant differences in the sizes of the groups of women and the incidences of events and outcomes within the TGCS between the three perinatal databases.
The TGCS is a standardised objective classification system where events and outcomes of labour and delivery can be incorporated. Obstetric core events and outcomes should be agreed and defined to set standards of care. This method provides continuous and available observations from delivery wards, possibly used for further interpretation, questions and international comparisons. The definition of quality may vary in different units and can only be ascertained when all the necessary information is available and considered together.
在国际上,十组分类系统(TGCS)已被用于报告剖宫产率,但也建议对其他结局进行分析。我们现在旨在介绍TGCS,作为一种利用围产期信息常规收集来评估分娩结局的方法。
本研究是一项描述TGCS应用的方法学研究。
挪威斯塔万格大学医院(SUH)、爱尔兰都柏林国家妇产医院和斯洛文尼亚国家围产期数据库(SLO)。
来自挪威SUH的9848名女性、来自爱尔兰都柏林国家妇产医院的9250名女性以及来自斯洛文尼亚SLO的106167名女性。
所有女性均根据TGCS进行分类,其中纳入了剖宫产、缩宫素加强宫缩、硬膜外镇痛、阴道助产、会阴切开术、括约肌破裂、产后出血、输血、产妇年龄>35岁、体重指数>30、阿氏评分、脐血pH值、缺氧缺血性脑病、产前和围产期死亡。
三个围产期数据库中,TGCS内女性组的规模以及事件和结局的发生率存在显著差异。
TGCS是一个标准化的客观分类系统,可纳入分娩的事件和结局。应就产科核心事件和结局达成一致并进行定义,以设定护理标准。该方法提供了来自产房的持续且可用的观察数据,可能用于进一步的解读、问题探讨和国际比较。不同单位对质量的定义可能不同,只有在所有必要信息都可用并综合考虑时才能确定。