巴西版步态冻结问卷的有效性。
Validity of the Brazilian version of the freezing of gait questionnaire.
作者信息
Baggio Jussara A Oliveira, Curtarelli Mônica B, Rodrigues Guilherme R, Tumas Vitor
机构信息
Department of Neuroscience and Behavior, Faculty of Medicine at Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
出版信息
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2012 Aug;70(8):599-603. doi: 10.1590/s0004-282x2012000800008.
OBJECTIVE
To validate the freezing of gait questionnaire (FOG-Q) for a Brazilian population of Parkinson's disease (PD) patients.
METHODS
One hundred and seven patients with a diagnosis of PD were evaluated by shortened UPDRS motor scale (sUPDRm), Hoehn and Yahr (HY), Schwab and England scale (SE), Berg balance scale (BBS), falls efficacy scale international (FES-I), gait and balance scale (GABS), and the FOG-Q Brazilian version.
RESULTS
47.7% of PD patients had FOG episodes; this group had worse scores on sUPDRSm, FOGQ, FES-I, BBS, GABS and FOG item of UPDRS when compared to the PD group without FOG. The internal consistency was 0.86, intra-rater 0.82 and inter-rater 0.78. The FOG-Q Brazilian version was significantly correlated with items related to gait and balance. The ROC curve was 0.94, the sensitivity was 0.90and specificity was 0.92.
CONCLUSION
Our study suggests that the FOG-Q Brazilian version is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing FOG in PD patients.
目的
验证帕金森病（PD）巴西患者群体的冻结步态问卷（FOG-Q）。
方法
采用简化的统一帕金森病评定量表运动部分（sUPDRm）、霍恩和雅尔分级（HY）、施瓦布和英格兰量表（SE）、伯格平衡量表（BBS）、国际跌倒效能量表（FES-I）、步态与平衡量表（GABS）以及FOG-Q巴西版本，对107例诊断为PD的患者进行评估。
结果
47.7%的PD患者有冻结步态发作；与无冻结步态的PD组相比，该组在sUPDRSm、FOGQ、FES-I、BBS、GABS以及UPDRS的冻结步态项目上得分更低。内部一致性为0.86，评分者内一致性为0.82，评分者间一致性为0.78。FOG-Q巴西版本与步态和平衡相关项目显著相关。ROC曲线为0.94，敏感性为0.90，特异性为0.92。
结论
我们的研究表明，FOG-Q巴西版本是评估PD患者冻结步态的可靠且有效的工具。
Zotero 插件