Suppr超能文献

意大利版步态冻结问卷的验证

The validation of an Italian version of the Freezing of Gait Questionnaire.

作者信息

Tambasco Nicola, Simoni Simone, Eusebi Paolo, Ripandelli Francesco, Brahimi Elona, Sacchini Elisa, Nigro Pasquale, Marsili Erica, Calabresi Paolo

机构信息

Clinica Neurologica, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Perugia, Perugia, Italy,

出版信息

Neurol Sci. 2015 May;36(5):759-64. doi: 10.1007/s10072-014-2037-5. Epub 2014 Dec 17.

Abstract

Freezing of gait (FOG) is a common and disabling symptom in Parkinson's disease (PD) and its staging is complex because of its episodic nature. Patient-reported assessments are essential in evaluating this disabling symptom. The Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (FOG-Q) is considered a valid and reliable tool for the assessment of FOG severity. The aim of our study was to validate the Italian version of FOG-Q and to investigate for its association with several clinical aspects of PD. Fifty-one PD patients were administered the FOG-Q and the timed up and go test. Moreover, patients were evaluated for the unified PD rating scale (UPDRS), the Hoehn and Yahr Scale (H&Y) and the falls-efficacy scale [FES(S)]. Mean (SD) FOG-Q item scores ranged between 1.5 and 2.7 (1.0-1.4); corrected item-total correlations ranged between 0.63 and 0.86. The total FOG-Q score ranged between 0 and 24, with a mean + SD of 12.6 (6.2) and a median (q1-q3) of 12 (9-17). Reliability was 0.91. FOG-Q correlated with H&Y (0.36, p = 0.0091), UPDRS part III (rS = 0.27, p = 0.054), PD duration (rS = 0.35, p < 0.01), FES(S) (rS = 0.58, p < 0.001) and the timed up and go test (rS = 0.51, p = 0.001). Non-significant positive correlations were observed for dyskinesia and motor fluctuations. Our study validates the Italian version of the FOG-Q, in that it results being a reliable instrument for assessing FOG in PD patients.

摘要

冻结步态(FOG)是帕金森病(PD)中一种常见且致残的症状,由于其发作性特点,其分期较为复杂。患者报告的评估对于评估这种致残症状至关重要。冻结步态问卷(FOG-Q)被认为是评估FOG严重程度的有效且可靠的工具。我们研究的目的是验证FOG-Q的意大利语版本,并调查其与PD的几个临床方面的关联。对51名PD患者进行了FOG-Q和计时起立行走测试。此外,对患者进行了统一帕金森病评定量表(UPDRS)、 Hoehn和Yahr量表(H&Y)以及跌倒效能量表[FES(S)]的评估。平均(标准差)FOG-Q项目得分在1.5至2.7之间(1.0 - 1.4);校正后的项目总分相关性在0.63至0.86之间。FOG-Q总分在0至24之间,平均 + 标准差为12.6(6.2),中位数(q1 - q3)为12(9 - 17)。信度为0.91。FOG-Q与H&Y相关(0.36,p = 0.0091)、UPDRS第三部分(rS = 0.27,p = 0.054)、PD病程(rS = 0.35,p < 0.01)、FES(S)(rS = 0.58,p < 0.001)以及计时起立行走测试(rS = 0.51,p = 0.001)。对于异动症和运动波动,观察到无显著的正相关性。我们的研究验证了FOG-Q的意大利语版本,因为它是评估PD患者FOG的可靠工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验