HSPH Proteomics Resource, Department of Genetics and Complex Diseases, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Electrophoresis. 2012 Aug;33(16):2516-26. doi: 10.1002/elps.201200031.
Fractionation of complex samples at the cellular, subcellular, protein, or peptide level is an indispensable strategy to improve the sensitivity in mass spectrometry-based proteomic profiling. This study revisits, evaluates, and compares the most common gel-based protein separation techniques i.e. 1D SDS-PAGE, 1D preparative SDS-PAGE, IEF-IPG, and 2D-PAGE in their performance as fractionation approaches in nano LC-ESI-MS/MS analysis of a mixture of protein standards and mitochondrial extracts isolated from rat liver. This work demonstrates that all the above techniques provide complementary protein identification results, but 1D SDS-PAGE and IEF-IPG had the highest number of identifications. The IEF-IPG technique resulted in the highest average number of detected peptides per protein. The 2D-PAGE was evaluated as a protein fractionation approach. This work shows that the recovery of proteins and resulting proteolytic digests is highly dependent on the total volume of the gel matrix. The performed comparison of the fractionation techniques demonstrates the potential of a combination of orthogonal 1D SDS-PAGE and IEF-IPG for the improved sensitivity of profiling without significant decrease in throughput.
对细胞、亚细胞、蛋白质或肽水平的复杂样品进行分级分离是提高基于质谱的蛋白质组学分析灵敏度的不可或缺的策略。本研究重新考察、评估和比较了最常见的基于凝胶的蛋白质分离技术,即 1D SDS-PAGE、1D 制备 SDS-PAGE、IEF-IPG 和 2D-PAGE,在纳米 LC-ESI-MS/MS 分析蛋白质标准混合物和从大鼠肝脏分离的线粒体提取物中的分级分离方法的性能。本工作表明,所有上述技术都提供了互补的蛋白质鉴定结果,但 1D SDS-PAGE 和 IEF-IPG 的鉴定数量最多。IEF-IPG 技术导致每个蛋白质检测到的肽的平均数量最高。2D-PAGE 被评估为蛋白质分级分离方法。本工作表明,蛋白质和所得酶切消化物的回收率高度依赖于凝胶基质的总体积。对分级分离技术的比较表明,正交 1D SDS-PAGE 和 IEF-IPG 的组合具有提高分析灵敏度的潜力,而不会显著降低通量。