Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Notre-Dame Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013 Mar;34(3):570-6. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3231. Epub 2012 Aug 16.
Endovascular treatment of wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms often results in incomplete occlusion or aneurysm recurrence. The goals of this study were to compare results of coil embolization with or without the assistance of self-expandable stents and to examine how stents may influence neointima formation.
Wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms were constructed in 24 animals and, after 4-6 weeks, were randomly allocated to 1 of 5 groups: 1) coil embolization using the assistance of 1 braided stent (n = 5); 2) coil embolization using the assistance of 2 braided stents in a Y configuration (n = 5); 3) coil embolization without stent assistance (n = 6); 4) Y-stenting alone (n = 4); and 5) untreated controls (n = 4). Angiographic results were compared at baseline and at 12 weeks, by using an ordinal scale. Neointima formation at the neck at 12 weeks was compared among groups by using a semiquantitative grading scale. Bench studies were performed to assess stent porosities.
Initial angiographic results were improved with single stent-assisted coiling compared with simple coiling (P = .013). Angiographic results at 12 weeks were improved with any stent assistance (P = .014). Neointimal closure of the aneurysm neck was similar with or without stent assistance (P = .908), with neointima covering coil loops but rarely stent struts. Y-stent placement alone had no therapeutic effect. Bench studies showed that porosities can be decreased with stent compaction, but a relatively stable porous transition zone was a limiting factor.
Stent-assisted coiling may improve results of embolization by allowing more complete initial coiling, but these high-porosity stents did not provide a scaffold for more complete neointimal closure of aneurysms.
血管内治疗宽颈分叉部动脉瘤往往导致不完全闭塞或动脉瘤复发。本研究旨在比较单纯线圈栓塞与支架辅助线圈栓塞的疗效,并探讨支架对血管内新生内膜形成的影响。
在 24 只动物中构建宽颈分叉部动脉瘤,4~6 周后,将其随机分为 5 组:1)使用 1 枚编织支架辅助线圈栓塞(n = 5);2)使用 2 枚编织支架呈 Y 型辅助线圈栓塞(n = 5);3)单纯线圈栓塞(n = 6);4)单纯 Y 型支架置入(n = 4);5)未治疗对照组(n = 4)。采用有序量表比较基线和 12 周时的血管造影结果。采用半定量分级量表比较各组 12 周时瘤颈处新生内膜形成情况。进行支架孔隙率的体外研究。
与单纯线圈栓塞相比,单枚支架辅助线圈栓塞可显著改善初始血管造影结果(P =.013)。任何支架辅助均可改善 12 周时的血管造影结果(P =.014)。有无支架辅助,瘤颈处新生内膜的覆盖情况相似(P =.908),即新生内膜覆盖线圈圈,但很少覆盖支架的支柱。单纯 Y 型支架置入无治疗作用。体外研究表明,支架压缩可降低孔隙率,但相对稳定的多孔过渡区是一个限制因素。
支架辅助线圈栓塞可通过允许更完全的初始线圈栓塞来改善栓塞疗效,但这些高孔隙率支架并未为动脉瘤更完全的血管内新生内膜覆盖提供支架。