Bernard and Irene Schwartz Neurointerventional Radiology Center, Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, USA.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012 Jan;33(1):159-63. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2719. Epub 2011 Oct 27.
Stent-supported aneurysm coiling has been utilized with increasing frequency over the past few years, particularly for addressing treatment of complex and wide-neck aneurysms. A sizable body of literature describing various experiences with stent-supported coiling now exists. The purpose of this research was to carry out a comprehensive literature survey of stent-supported aneurysm coiling.
A survey of papers reporting results with stent-assisted aneurysm coiling through January 2011 was conducted to identify the prevalence of stent-related and other complications, occlusion rates, and clinical and angiographic follow-up data.
Thirty-nine articles with 1517 patients met inclusion criteria for initial analysis, follow-up analysis, or both. Overall, 9% of cases were confounded by a technical stent-related issue, including 4% failure of deployment. The overall procedure complication rate was 19%, with periprocedural mortality of 2.1%. Approximately 45% of aneurysms were completely occluded at first treatment session, increasing to 61% on follow-up. Approximately 3.5% in-stent stenosis and 0.6% stent occlusion were observed at angiographic follow-up. Delayed stroke or transient ischemic attack was reported in 3% of subjects. Within a subset of articles, the incidence of stent-related issues in the first 10 patients was significantly higher than in subsequent subjects, supporting the notion of a procedural "learning curve."
In experienced hands, the morbidity of stent-supported coiling is somewhat higher compared with "traditional" coiling. As might be expected, execution of the procedure appears improved with experience. Complete occlusion rates remain somewhat low. More and longer term angiographic follow-up information is needed to understand delayed stent-related issues and to better define the durability of treatment.
在过去的几年中,支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术的应用越来越频繁,特别是在处理复杂和宽颈动脉瘤方面。目前已经有大量文献描述了各种支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术的经验。本研究旨在对支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术的文献进行全面综述。
对截至 2011 年 1 月报告支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术结果的文献进行了调查,以确定支架相关和其他并发症的发生率、闭塞率以及临床和血管造影随访数据。
39 篇文章,共 1517 例患者符合初始分析、随访分析或两者的纳入标准。总体而言,9%的病例存在技术相关的支架问题,包括 4%的支架展开失败。总的手术并发症发生率为 19%,围手术期死亡率为 2.1%。大约 45%的动脉瘤在首次治疗时完全闭塞,随访时增加到 61%。在血管造影随访中观察到约 3.5%的支架内狭窄和 0.6%的支架闭塞。迟发性卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作在 3%的患者中报告。在部分文章中,前 10 例患者中支架相关问题的发生率明显高于随后的患者,这支持了手术“学习曲线”的观点。
在有经验的医生手中,支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术的发病率略高于“传统”弹簧圈栓塞术。正如预期的那样,随着经验的积累,手术执行情况似乎有所改善。完全闭塞率仍然较低。需要更多和更长时间的血管造影随访信息来了解迟发性支架相关问题,并更好地定义治疗的耐久性。