Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
BJOG. 2012 Nov;119(12):1440-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03459.x. Epub 2012 Aug 20.
Postpartum urinary retention (PUR) is a common condition with varying prevalence. Measurement of the post-void residual volume (PVRV) is not regularly performed. Various studies have been published on overt (the inability to void after giving birth, requiring catheterisation) and covert (an increased PVRV after spontaneous micturition) PUR. To evaluate which clinical prognostic factors are related to PUR, the identification of independent risk factors for covert and overt PUR is needed.
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies reporting on risk factors for PUR.
Systematic search of MEDLINE and EMBASE to September 2011.
Articles that reported on women diagnosed with PUR or with an abnormal PVRV.
The included articles were selected by two authors. We constructed two-by-two tables for potential risk factors of overt and covert PUR and calculated pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals.
Twenty-three observational studies with original data were eligible for data extraction, of which 13 could be used for meta-analysis. Statistically significant risk factors for overt PUR were epidural analgesia (OR 7.7), instrumental delivery (OR 4.5), episiotomy (OR 4.8) and primiparity (OR 2.4). For covert PUR, variety in the definitions used resulted in heterogeneity; no significant prognostic factors were found.
Instrumental delivery, epidural analgesia, episiotomy and nulliparity are statistically significantly associated with a higher incidence of overt PUR. The same factors were identified for covert PUR, but without statistical significance. Uniformity in definitions in future research is essential to create a prognostic model.
产后尿潴留(PUR)是一种常见病症,其发病率不一。通常不会测量剩余尿(PVRV)。已经有多项研究报道了显性(分娩后无法排尿,需要导尿)和隐性(自发性排尿后 PVRV 增加)PUR。为了评估哪些临床预测因素与 PUR 相关,需要确定隐性和显性 PUR 的独立危险因素。
我们对报道 PUR 危险因素的观察性研究进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。
系统检索 MEDLINE 和 EMBASE 数据库,检索时限截至 2011 年 9 月。
报道 PUR 或异常 PVRV 女性的文章。
两位作者对纳入的文章进行选择。我们为显性和隐性 PUR 的潜在危险因素构建了 2×2 表,并计算了汇总比值比(OR)及其 95%置信区间。
有 23 项原始数据的观察性研究符合纳入标准,其中 13 项可用于荟萃分析。显性 PUR 的统计学显著危险因素包括硬膜外镇痛(OR 7.7)、器械分娩(OR 4.5)、会阴切开术(OR 4.8)和初产妇(OR 2.4)。对于隐性 PUR,由于定义的多样性导致异质性,未发现有统计学意义的预后因素。
器械分娩、硬膜外镇痛、会阴切开术和初产妇与显性 PUR 的发生率显著相关。同样的因素也与隐性 PUR 相关,但无统计学意义。未来研究中需要定义的一致性,以创建预后模型。