Department of Orthopaedics, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, No. 168, Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, People's Republic of China.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Dec;65(12):1321-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.06.007. Epub 2012 Aug 15.
To evaluate the reliability and validity of the simplified Chinese version of the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (SC-QDS).
The QDS was translated and cross-culturally adapted into SC following international guidelines. The SC-QDS was completed by 114 patients with low back pain (LBP) and 65 healthy controls, along with the SC Oswestry Disability Index (SC-ODI) and visual analogue scale (VAS). Psychometric evaluation included homogeneity and reproducibility by internal consistency and test-retest reliability and construct validity by calculating the Pearson's correlation coefficients among QDS, SC-ODI, and VAS. Discriminative validity was determined by student's t-test.
SC-QDS scores were well distributed, with no floor or ceiling effects. Internal consistency was excellent (Cronbach α 0.976). The items and overall SC-QDS were correlated (r=0.640-0.898 and P<0.0001). Intraclass correlation coefficient of test-retest reliability was excellent (0.987, 95% confidence interval: 0.978-0.992). Construct validity was confirmed by high correlation of SC-QDS and SC-ODI (r=0.901 and P<0.0001) and VAS (r=0.770 and P<0.0001) scores, as was discriminative validity by significantly different SC-QDS scores for patients with LBP and controls (46.3 ± 19.9 vs. 14.6 ± 8.5 and P<0.0001).
The SC-QDS has good internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct and discriminative validity. The SC-QDS is appropriate for clinical and research uses with Chinese-speaking patients with LBP in mainland China.
评估简化中文版魁北克腰痛残疾量表(SC-QDS)的信度和效度。
根据国际指南,将 QDS 翻译并跨文化改编为 SC。114 例腰痛(LBP)患者和 65 例健康对照者完成了 SC-QDS,同时还完成了 SC 腰痛残疾指数(SC-ODI)和视觉模拟评分(VAS)。计量学评估包括同质性和内部一致性的再现性和测试-重测信度,以及通过计算 QDS、SC-ODI 和 VAS 之间的 Pearson 相关系数来构建效度。通过学生 t 检验确定判别效度。
SC-QDS 评分分布良好,无地板或天花板效应。内部一致性极好(Cronbach α 0.976)。项目和整体 SC-QDS 呈正相关(r=0.640-0.898,P<0.0001)。测试-重测信度的组内相关系数极好(0.987,95%置信区间:0.978-0.992)。通过 SC-QDS 与 SC-ODI(r=0.901,P<0.0001)和 VAS(r=0.770,P<0.0001)评分的高度相关性证实了结构效度,腰痛患者和对照组之间 SC-QDS 评分的显著差异证实了判别效度(46.3±19.9 与 14.6±8.5,P<0.0001)。
SC-QDS 具有良好的内部一致性、测试-重测信度、结构和判别效度。SC-QDS 适合中国大陆讲中文的腰痛患者的临床和研究使用。