Suppr超能文献

魁北克腰痛残疾量表的跨文化适应性简化中文版本有效。

A valid cross-culturally adapted simplified Chinese version of the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, No. 168, Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Dec;65(12):1321-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.06.007. Epub 2012 Aug 15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the reliability and validity of the simplified Chinese version of the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (SC-QDS).

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

The QDS was translated and cross-culturally adapted into SC following international guidelines. The SC-QDS was completed by 114 patients with low back pain (LBP) and 65 healthy controls, along with the SC Oswestry Disability Index (SC-ODI) and visual analogue scale (VAS). Psychometric evaluation included homogeneity and reproducibility by internal consistency and test-retest reliability and construct validity by calculating the Pearson's correlation coefficients among QDS, SC-ODI, and VAS. Discriminative validity was determined by student's t-test.

RESULTS

SC-QDS scores were well distributed, with no floor or ceiling effects. Internal consistency was excellent (Cronbach α 0.976). The items and overall SC-QDS were correlated (r=0.640-0.898 and P<0.0001). Intraclass correlation coefficient of test-retest reliability was excellent (0.987, 95% confidence interval: 0.978-0.992). Construct validity was confirmed by high correlation of SC-QDS and SC-ODI (r=0.901 and P<0.0001) and VAS (r=0.770 and P<0.0001) scores, as was discriminative validity by significantly different SC-QDS scores for patients with LBP and controls (46.3 ± 19.9 vs. 14.6 ± 8.5 and P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The SC-QDS has good internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct and discriminative validity. The SC-QDS is appropriate for clinical and research uses with Chinese-speaking patients with LBP in mainland China.

摘要

目的

评估简化中文版魁北克腰痛残疾量表(SC-QDS)的信度和效度。

研究设计和设置

根据国际指南,将 QDS 翻译并跨文化改编为 SC。114 例腰痛(LBP)患者和 65 例健康对照者完成了 SC-QDS,同时还完成了 SC 腰痛残疾指数(SC-ODI)和视觉模拟评分(VAS)。计量学评估包括同质性和内部一致性的再现性和测试-重测信度,以及通过计算 QDS、SC-ODI 和 VAS 之间的 Pearson 相关系数来构建效度。通过学生 t 检验确定判别效度。

结果

SC-QDS 评分分布良好,无地板或天花板效应。内部一致性极好(Cronbach α 0.976)。项目和整体 SC-QDS 呈正相关(r=0.640-0.898,P<0.0001)。测试-重测信度的组内相关系数极好(0.987,95%置信区间:0.978-0.992)。通过 SC-QDS 与 SC-ODI(r=0.901,P<0.0001)和 VAS(r=0.770,P<0.0001)评分的高度相关性证实了结构效度,腰痛患者和对照组之间 SC-QDS 评分的显著差异证实了判别效度(46.3±19.9 与 14.6±8.5,P<0.0001)。

结论

SC-QDS 具有良好的内部一致性、测试-重测信度、结构和判别效度。SC-QDS 适合中国大陆讲中文的腰痛患者的临床和研究使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验