Savitzky Alan H, Mori Akira, Hutchinson Deborah A, Saporito Ralph A, Burghardt Gordon M, Lillywhite Harvey B, Meinwald Jerrold
Chemoecology. 2012 Sep;22(3):141-158. doi: 10.1007/s00049-012-0112-z. Epub 2012 Aug 4.
Chemical defenses are widespread among animals, and the compounds involved may be either synthesized from nontoxic precursors or sequestered from an environmental source. Defensive sequestration has been studied extensively among invertebrates, but relatively few examples have been documented among vertebrates. Nonetheless, the number of described cases of defensive sequestration in tetrapod vertebrates has increased recently and includes diverse lineages of amphibians and reptiles (including birds). The best-known examples involve poison frogs, but other examples include natricine snakes that sequester toxins from amphibians and two genera of insectivorous birds. Commonalities among these diverse taxa include the combination of consuming toxic prey and exhibiting some form of passive defense, such as aposematism, mimicry, or presumptive death-feigning. Some species exhibit passive sequestration, in which dietary toxins simply require an extended period of time to clear from the tissues, whereas other taxa exhibit morphological or physiological specializations that enhance the uptake, storage, and/or delivery of exogenous toxins. It remains uncertain whether any sequestered toxins of tetrapods bioaccumulate across multiple trophic levels, but multitrophic accumulation seems especially likely in cases involving consumption of phytophagous or mycophagous invertebrates and perhaps consumption of poison frogs by snakes. We predict that additional examples of defensive toxin sequestration in amphibians and reptiles will be revealed by collaborations between field biologists and natural product chemists. Candidates for future investigation include specialized predators on mites, social insects, slugs, and toxic amphibians. Comprehensive studies of the ecological, evolutionary, behavioral, and regulatory aspects of sequestration will require teams of ecologists, systematists, ethologists, physiologists, molecular biologists, and chemists. The widespread occurrence of sequestered defenses has important implications for the ecology, evolution, and conservation of amphibians and reptiles.
化学防御在动物界广泛存在,所涉及的化合物可能是由无毒前体合成而来,或者是从环境来源中获取的。防御性获取现象在无脊椎动物中已得到广泛研究,但在脊椎动物中记录的例子相对较少。尽管如此,最近描述的四足脊椎动物防御性获取案例数量有所增加,包括两栖动物和爬行动物(包括鸟类)的不同谱系。最著名的例子涉及箭毒蛙,但其他例子包括从两栖动物获取毒素的水游蛇以及两种食虫鸟类。这些不同类群的共同特征包括食用有毒猎物并表现出某种形式的被动防御,如警戒色、拟态或假死。一些物种表现出被动获取,即饮食中的毒素只需较长时间才能从组织中清除,而其他类群则表现出形态或生理上的特化,以增强对外源毒素的摄取、储存和/或传递。目前尚不确定四足动物的任何获取毒素是否会在多个营养级上生物累积,但在涉及食用植食性或食菌性无脊椎动物以及可能蛇类捕食箭毒蛙的情况下,多营养级累积似乎尤其可能。我们预测,野外生物学家和天然产物化学家之间的合作将揭示两栖动物和爬行动物防御性毒素获取的更多例子。未来研究的候选对象包括捕食螨虫、群居昆虫、蛞蝓和有毒两栖动物的专门捕食者。对获取现象的生态、进化、行为和调节方面进行全面研究将需要生态学家、分类学家、行为学家、生理学家、分子生物学家和化学家团队。防御性获取的广泛存在对两栖动物和爬行动物的生态、进化和保护具有重要意义。