Harris Richard J, Arbuckle Kevin
40 Teilo Street, Dingle, Liverpool, L8 8BS, UK.
Department of Evolution, Ecology and Behaviour, University of Liverpool, Crown Street, Liverpool, L69 7ZB, UK.
Toxins (Basel). 2016 Jun 23;8(7):193. doi: 10.3390/toxins8070193.
Toxic weaponry in the form of venom and poison has evolved in most groups of animals, including all four major lineages of tetrapods. Moreover, the evolution of such traits has been linked to several key aspects of the biology of toxic animals including life-history and diversification. Despite this, attempts to investigate the macroevolutionary patterns underlying such weaponry are lacking. In this study we analyse patterns of venom and poison evolution across reptiles, amphibians, mammals, and birds using a suite of phylogenetic comparative methods. We find that each major lineage has a characteristic pattern of trait evolution, but mammals and reptiles evolve under a surprisingly similar regime, whilst that of amphibians appears to be particularly distinct and highly contrasting compared to other groups. Our results also suggest that the mechanism of toxin acquisition may be an important distinction in such evolutionary patterns; the evolution of biosynthesis is far less dynamic than that of sequestration of toxins from the diet. Finally, contrary to the situation in amphibians, other tetrapod groups show an association between the evolution of toxic weaponry and higher diversification rates. Taken together, our study provides the first broad-scale analysis of macroevolutionary patterns of venom and poison throughout tetrapods.
毒液和毒素形式的有毒武器在大多数动物群体中都有进化,包括四足动物的所有四个主要谱系。此外,这些特征的进化与有毒动物生物学的几个关键方面有关,包括生活史和多样化。尽管如此,仍缺乏对这类武器潜在宏观进化模式的研究。在本研究中,我们使用一系列系统发育比较方法,分析了爬行动物、两栖动物、哺乳动物和鸟类中毒液和毒素的进化模式。我们发现,每个主要谱系都有其特征性的性状进化模式,但哺乳动物和爬行动物的进化模式惊人地相似,而两栖动物的进化模式与其他群体相比似乎特别独特且形成强烈对比。我们的结果还表明,毒素获取机制可能是这类进化模式的一个重要区别;生物合成的进化远不如从饮食中摄取毒素的进化活跃。最后,与两栖动物的情况相反,其他四足动物群体显示出有毒武器的进化与更高的多样化率之间存在关联。综上所述,我们的研究首次对整个四足动物毒液和毒素的宏观进化模式进行了广泛分析。