Faculty of Physical Education and Recreation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB.
Can J Public Health. 2012 May-Jun;103(3):175-7. doi: 10.1007/BF03403808.
A clear income gradient exists for the sport and physical activity (PA) participation of Canadian children. Governments in Canada recently introduced tax credits to alleviate the financial burden associated with registering a child in organized physical activity (including sport). The majority of these credits, including the Children's Fitness Tax Credit, are non-refundable (i.e., reduces the amount of income tax a person pays). Such credits are useful only for individuals who incur a certain level of tax liability. Thus, low-income families who may pay little or no income tax will not benefit from the presence of non-refundable tax credits. In this commentary, we argue that the non-refundable tax credit is inherently inequitable for promoting PA. We suggest that a combination of refundable tax credits and subsidized programming for low-income children would be more equitable than the current approach of the Canadian government and several provinces that are expending approximately $200 million to support these credits.
加拿大儿童参与体育运动存在明显的收入差距。加拿大政府最近推出了税收抵免政策,以减轻与注册儿童参加有组织的体育活动(包括运动)相关的经济负担。这些抵免政策中的大多数,包括儿童健身税收抵免,都是不可退还的(即减少个人缴纳所得税的金额)。这些抵免仅对那些产生一定程度纳税义务的个人有用。因此,收入较低的家庭可能缴纳很少或不缴纳所得税,因此不会从不可退还的税收抵免中受益。在这篇评论中,我们认为,不可退还的税收抵免从本质上说是不公平的,不利于促进体育活动。我们建议,为低收入儿童提供可退还的税收抵免和补贴性编程,比加拿大政府和几个省份目前的做法更公平,这些省份正在花费大约 2 亿美元来支持这些抵免政策。