Martinez V, Azzopardi J G
Histopathology. 1979 Nov;3(6):467-88. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.1979.tb03029.x.
The criteria for the separation of invasive lobular and ductal carcinomas are analysed. Lobular tumours account for 14% of invasive cancers in our material. The widely differing figures given in the literature are mainly attributable to intrinsic difficulties of classification. In addition to the classical dissociated-cell patterns with single filing, a tragetoid appearance and related features, variants with trabecular, loose alveolar and tubular features are recognized; a 'solid' variant requires further investigation. The variants either represent better differentiated forms, or in some cases, an 'earlier' phase in the production of the more traditional Indian file formations and dartboard patterns. Focal signet-ring cell differentiation is another newly-recognized feature. The theoretical and practical implications of these variants are considered. The division into invasive lobular and ductal carcinomas is not as easy as most of the literature implies. Five per cent of cases could not be so classified and, in some of these unclassified cases, both ductal and lobular differentiation may be present. In the diagnosis of problem cases, no single parameter proved reliable but a combination of several parameters enables one to make an objective diagnosis in about 95% of cases.
分析了浸润性小叶癌和导管癌的鉴别标准。在我们的资料中,小叶肿瘤占浸润性癌的14%。文献中给出的差异很大的数据主要归因于分类的内在困难。除了具有单行排列、靶样外观及相关特征的典型分离细胞模式外,还认识到具有小梁状、疏松腺泡状和管状特征的变体;一种“实性”变体需要进一步研究。这些变体要么代表分化较好的形式,要么在某些情况下,是产生更传统的印戒样结构和靶样模式的“早期”阶段。局灶性印戒细胞分化是另一个新认识的特征。考虑了这些变体的理论和实际意义。浸润性小叶癌和导管癌的区分并不像大多数文献所暗示的那么容易。5%的病例无法如此分类,在一些未分类的病例中,可能同时存在导管和小叶分化。在疑难病例的诊断中,没有一个单一参数被证明是可靠的,但几个参数的组合能够使约95%的病例做出客观诊断。