Sakata Ryuzo, Kuwano Hiroyuki, Yokomise Hiroyasu
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Shogoin-Kawahara, Sakyo, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Oct;60(10):625-38. doi: 10.1007/s11748-012-0128-x.
To elucidate the relationship between hospital volume and cardiothoracic surgical outcomes in Japan using the annual survey data, obtained between 2005 and 2009, collected by the Committee for Scientific Affairs of the Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery.
The relationship between hospital volume and 30-day mortality was analyzed using a logistic regression model. The empirical Bayes (EB) method was also used to stabilize any large variation resulting from a small sample size. Hospitals, whose lower limit of the EB mortality 95 % confidence interval was above the mean EB mortality of all hospitals, were defined as those with "inferior outcomes". The surgical procedures analyzed were coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG: elective + emergency), elective CABG, emergency CABG, single-valve surgery, surgery for acute type A dissection, open heart surgery for newborns, open heart surgery for infants, surgery for lung cancer, and surgery for esophageal cancer.
There were large variations in 30-day mortality for all procedures, particularly in the lower-volume hospitals. There was a significant but weak inverse correlation between the hospital volume and the 30-day mortality rate for elective CABG, emergency CABG, single valve surgery, surgery for acute type A dissection, and lung cancer surgery. There was no correlation between hospital volume and the 30-day morality for open heart surgery for newborns and infants, and esophageal cancer surgery. After EB method adjustment, there was no hospital with inferior outcomes for conventional operations such as elective CABG, single-valve surgery and lung cancer surgery. The ratio of hospitals with inferior outcomes in more complex procedures was 1.8 % for open heart surgery for newborns, 0.8 % for open heart surgery for infants, and 0.2 % for esophageal cancer surgery.
There is a weak or no inverse correlation between the hospital volume and the mortality in cardiothoracic surgery in Japan. Most of the low-volume hospitals are not associated with inferior outcomes. The performance of the lower-volume hospitals should be carefully scrutinized using risk adjustment.
利用日本胸外科学会科学事务委员会在2005年至2009年期间收集的年度调查数据,阐明日本医院手术量与心胸外科手术结果之间的关系。
使用逻辑回归模型分析医院手术量与30天死亡率之间的关系。还采用经验贝叶斯(EB)方法来稳定因样本量小而产生的任何较大变异。将EB死亡率95%置信区间下限高于所有医院平均EB死亡率的医院定义为“手术结果较差”的医院。分析的手术程序包括冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG:择期+急诊)、择期CABG、急诊CABG、单瓣膜手术、急性A型主动脉夹层手术、新生儿心脏直视手术、婴儿心脏直视手术、肺癌手术和食管癌手术。
所有手术的30天死亡率差异很大,尤其是在手术量较低的医院。择期CABG、急诊CABG、单瓣膜手术、急性A型主动脉夹层手术和肺癌手术的医院手术量与30天死亡率之间存在显著但微弱的负相关。医院手术量与新生儿和婴儿心脏直视手术以及食管癌手术的30天死亡率之间没有相关性。经过EB方法调整后,对于择期CABG、单瓣膜手术和肺癌手术等传统手术,没有手术结果较差的医院。在更复杂的手术中,新生儿心脏直视手术手术结果较差的医院比例为1.8%,婴儿心脏直视手术为0.8%,食管癌手术为0.2%。
在日本,医院手术量与心胸外科手术死亡率之间存在微弱或无负相关。大多数手术量低的医院与较差的手术结果无关。应使用风险调整仔细审查手术量较低医院的表现。