Suppr超能文献

质子泵抑制剂、酸泵拮抗剂或吲哚美辛-磷脂酰胆碱对吲哚美辛诱导的小肠损伤的体内外保护作用。

In vitro and in vivo protection against indomethacin-induced small intestinal injury by proton pump inhibitors, acid pump antagonists, or indomethacin-phosphatidylcholine.

机构信息

Department of Integrative Biology and Pharmacology, The University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Tex. 77030, USA.

出版信息

Digestion. 2012;86(2):171-7. doi: 10.1159/000339882. Epub 2012 Aug 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used to prevent nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-induced peptic ulcers. NSAIDs produce small intestinal injury and some PPIs have been reported to protect against NSAID-induced small bowel injury in rats. The aim of this study was to compare PPIs, revaprazan, and phosphatidylcholine-associated indomethacin (Indo-PC) for protection against indomethacin (Indo)-induced small bowel injury.

METHODS

Rat intestinal epithelial cells (IEC-6) were pretreated with omeprazole, lansoprazole, or revaprazan prior to exposure to Indo or Indo-PC. Cell viability was assessed by methyl thiazolyl tetrazolium assay. Omeprazole, lansoprazole, or revaprazan was administered orally to rats prior to the vehicle or Indo. Indo-PC was administered alone. After 24 h, small intestinal erosions were counted; intestinal bleeding was assessed as the hemoglobin concentration of small intestinal fluid.

RESULTS

Omeprazole, lansoprazole, and revaprazan did not protect against Indo-induced IEC-6 cell injury. Indo-PC was less damaging in vitro than Indo alone. In vivo, neither omeprazole nor lansoprazole protected against Indo-induced small bowel injury; however, revaprazan pretreatment and Indo-PC resulted in significantly fewer erosions (>50% reduction) or bleeding (>80% reduction).

CONCLUSION

PPIs showed no small bowel protective effect in vitro or in vivo. Revaprazan showed a small bowel protective effect in vivo, whereas Indo-PC was protective both in vitro and in vivo.

摘要

背景/目的:质子泵抑制剂 (PPIs) 被广泛用于预防非甾体抗炎药 (NSAID) 引起的消化性溃疡。NSAIDs 会导致小肠损伤,一些 PPI 已被报道可预防大鼠 NSAID 诱导的小肠损伤。本研究旨在比较 PPI、雷贝拉唑和磷脂酰胆碱相关吲哚美辛 (Indo-PC) 对吲哚美辛 (Indo) 诱导的小肠损伤的保护作用。

方法

用雷贝拉唑、兰索拉唑或雷贝拉唑预处理大鼠肠上皮细胞 (IEC-6),然后暴露于 Indo 或 Indo-PC。通过噻唑蓝比色法评估细胞活力。用奥美拉唑、兰索拉唑或雷贝拉唑口服给药,然后用载体或 Indo 预处理大鼠。单独给予 Indo-PC。24 小时后,计数小肠溃疡;通过小肠液中血红蛋白浓度评估肠出血。

结果

奥美拉唑、兰索拉唑和雷贝拉唑不能预防 Indo 诱导的 IEC-6 细胞损伤。 Indo-PC 在体外的损伤小于 Indo 单独使用。在体内,奥美拉唑和兰索拉唑均不能预防 Indo 诱导的小肠损伤;然而,雷贝拉唑预处理和 Indo-PC 导致的溃疡数量明显减少 (>50%减少) 或出血 (>80%减少)。

结论

PPIs 在体外和体内均无小肠保护作用。雷贝拉唑在体内显示出小肠保护作用,而 Indo-PC 在体外和体内均具有保护作用。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

8
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced enteropathy.非甾体抗炎药所致小肠病
Intest Res. 2017 Oct;15(4):446-455. doi: 10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.446. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
10
Suppression of contractile activity in the small intestine by indomethacin and omeprazole.吲哚美辛和奥美拉唑对小肠收缩活动的抑制作用。
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2015 May 1;308(9):G785-93. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00458.2014. Epub 2015 Feb 26.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验