Lehmann Karl Martin, Devigus Alessandro, Igiel Christopher, Weyhrauch Michael, Schmidtmann Irene, Wentaschek Stefan, Scheller Herbert
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany.
Eur J Esthet Dent. 2012 Autumn;7(3):324-33.
This in vitro study evaluated the accordance of dental color measurement devices with a Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage (CIE)-compliant reference system, by comparing the CIE lightness, chroma, and hue (LCh°) color coordinates of ceramic samples.
Four color measurement devices: Vita Easyshade® Advance (A); DeguDent Shadepilot (B); X-Rite® Shadevision (C); and Crystaleye Olympus (D), were compared with a CIE-compliant reference system by recording the LCh° color coordinates of ceramic samples matching the tooth colors of the Vita Linearguide 3D-Master®, under standardized test conditions. Differences between regression lines for the dental color measurement device data and regression lines for the CIE-compliant reference system data were evaluated.
All devices offered high intraclass correlation coefficients (0.9771- 0.9999) for the LCh° color coordinates. The regression lines of the L* and C* coordinates for device A were steeper than those of the CIE-compliant reference system; the regression lines for devices B, C, and D were nearly parallel to those of the reference system, but with an offset. The regression lines of the h° coordinates for all devices were almost parallel to those of the reference system, with slopes near 1. Excluding the L* and h° coordinate measurements of device A, the measurements with the devices exhibited deviations from the reference system that were greater than those expected by chance (P < 0.0002).
The dental color measurement devices assessed here offered excellent reproducibility, but showed significant deviations from the CIE-compliant reference system regarding the LCh° color coordinates.
本体外研究通过比较陶瓷样本的国际照明委员会(CIE)明度、彩度和色调(LCh°)颜色坐标,评估牙科颜色测量设备与符合CIE标准的参考系统的一致性。
在标准化测试条件下,记录与Vita Linearguide 3D-Master®牙齿颜色匹配的陶瓷样本的LCh°颜色坐标,将四种颜色测量设备:Vita Easyshade® Advance(A);DeguDent Shadepilot™(B);X-Rite® Shadevision(C);以及Crystaleye Olympus(D)与符合CIE标准的参考系统进行比较。评估牙科颜色测量设备数据的回归线与符合CIE标准的参考系统数据的回归线之间的差异。
所有设备对于LCh°颜色坐标均提供了较高的组内相关系数(0.9771 - 0.9999)。设备A的L和C坐标的回归线比符合CIE标准的参考系统的回归线更陡;设备B、C和D的回归线几乎与参考系统的回归线平行,但有偏移。所有设备的h°坐标的回归线几乎与参考系统的回归线平行,斜率接近1。排除设备A的L*和h°坐标测量值后,这些设备的测量值与参考系统的偏差大于偶然预期的偏差(P < 0.0002)。
此处评估的牙科颜色测量设备具有出色的可重复性,但在LCh°颜色坐标方面与符合CIE标准的参考系统存在显著偏差。