• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

信息权与捐赠受孕:领养带来的启示?

Information rights and donor conception: lessons from adoption?

作者信息

Chisholm Richard

机构信息

Australian National University College of Law.

出版信息

J Law Med. 2012 Jun;19(4):722-41.

PMID:22908616
Abstract

This article reviews the Australian experience in providing information rights for people separated through adoption, and considers its relevance in adjusting the competing interests of those involved in donor conception. The Australian laws, which differ from State to State, create information rights for adults who have been adopted, and also--with more qualifications--for other family members, such as birth parents and siblings. Some laws also seek to protect privacy, notably by use of the "contact veto". The author argues that the review of the Australian laws provides strong support for the rights of donor offspring, when adult, to information about their genetic origins. It also raises important questions about the rights and interests of other family members involved in donor conception, and how they might be accommodated.

摘要

本文回顾了澳大利亚在为因收养而分离的人提供信息权方面的经验,并探讨了其在协调参与捐赠受孕各方利益冲突方面的相关性。澳大利亚各州的法律不尽相同,为被收养的成年人创设了信息权,对于其他家庭成员,如亲生父母和兄弟姐妹,也在更多限制条件下赋予了信息权。一些法律还试图保护隐私,特别是通过使用“接触否决权”来实现。作者认为,对澳大利亚法律的审视有力地支持了捐赠后代成年后获取其遗传起源信息的权利。这也引发了关于参与捐赠受孕的其他家庭成员的权利和利益以及如何兼顾这些权利和利益的重要问题。

相似文献

1
Information rights and donor conception: lessons from adoption?信息权与捐赠受孕:领养带来的启示?
J Law Med. 2012 Jun;19(4):722-41.
2
Accessing donor conception information in Australia: a call for retrospective access.获取澳大利亚的捐赠受孕信息:呼吁进行追溯性获取。
J Law Med. 2012 Jun;19(4):707-21.
3
Donor-conceived individuals and access to information about their genetic origins: the relevance and role of rights.通过捐赠受孕出生的个体及其获取有关其遗传起源信息的权利:权利的相关性和作用。
J Law Med. 2012 Jun;19(4):742-57.
4
Donor conception legislation in Victoria, Australia: the "Time to Tell" campaign, donor-linking and implications for clinical practice.澳大利亚维多利亚州的供体受孕立法:“是时候告知了”运动、供体联系及其对临床实践的影响。
J Law Med. 2012 Jun;19(4):803-19.
5
Legal parent versus biological parent: the impact of disclosure.法定父母与生物学父母:信息披露的影响。
J Law Med. 2012 Jun;19(4):790-802.
6
Time for a national approach to donor conception in Australia.澳大利亚需要采取全国性的捐赠受孕方法了。
J Law Med. 2011 Sep;19(1):7-12.
7
Keeping mum about dad: "contracts" to protect gamete donor anonymity.对父亲守口如瓶:保护配子捐赠者匿名性的“契约”
J Law Med. 2012 Jun;19(4):758-68.
8
Psycho-social, ethical and legal arguments for and against the retrospective release of information about donors to donor-conceived individuals in Australia.关于在澳大利亚支持和反对向通过捐赠受孕出生的个人追溯披露捐赠者信息的社会心理、伦理和法律论据。
J Law Med. 2011 Dec;19(2):354-76.
9
The rights of donor inseminated children to know their genetic origins in Australia.在澳大利亚,通过捐赠精子受孕出生的孩子了解其遗传起源的权利。
Aust J Fam Law. 2005 Dec;19(3):222-44.
10
Competing interests and gamete donation: the case for anonymity.利益冲突与配子捐赠:匿名的理由
Seton Hall Law Rev. 2009;39(3):919-54.

引用本文的文献

1
Absence of laws regarding sperm and oocyte donation in Japan and the impacts on donors, parents, and the people born as a result.日本缺乏关于精子和卵子捐赠的法律及其对捐赠者、父母以及由此出生的人的影响。
Reprod Med Biol. 2020 Jun 7;19(3):295-298. doi: 10.1002/rmb2.12329. eCollection 2020 Jul.
2
Process and Pitfalls of Sperm Cryopreservation.精子冷冻保存的过程与陷阱
J Clin Med. 2017 Sep 19;6(9):89. doi: 10.3390/jcm6090089.
3
Proposed legislative change mandating retrospective release of identifying information: consultation with donors and Government response.
拟议的立法变更要求追溯性披露身份识别信息:与捐赠者的磋商及政府回应
Hum Reprod. 2014 Feb;29(2):286-92. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det434. Epub 2013 Dec 6.
4
Conceptualising a child-centric paradigm : do we have freedom of choice in donor conception reproduction?概念化以儿童为中心的范式:在供体受孕生殖中,我们是否有选择的自由?
J Bioeth Inq. 2013 Oct;10(3):369-81. doi: 10.1007/s11673-013-9454-7. Epub 2013 Jun 19.