Blyth Eric, Crawshaw Marilyn, Frith Lucy, Jones Caroline
Social Work, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield HDI 3DH, England.
J Law Med. 2012 Jun;19(4):769-89.
This article reports on a systematic review of English language, peer-reviewed publications from 13 empirical studies with donor-conceived children and adults regarding their experiences and perceptions of donor conception. A total of 19 articles that met the inclusion criteria were reviewed. These were identified by means of a bibliographic search of four electronic databases for the period 1990-2011 and supplemented by the authors' personal knowledge of work in this field. No reports from such studies appeared prior to 2000, and more than half have been published since 2008, demonstrating the relative novelty of research in this field. Much of the reviewed research evidence concerns individuals conceived through sperm donation conducted under a regime promoting both anonymity and nondisclosure. Consequently, there is little research that pertains to individuals conceived through other forms of collaborative reproduction, nor to those conceived under arrangements and regimes in which early parental disclosure is both advocated and practised and the identity of the donor and of other genetic relatives may be accessible to donor-conceived individuals. The studies consistently report that most donor-conceived people have an interest in securing information about their genetic and biographical heritage - more information than most of them have been able to obtain. Although a number of methodological limitations in the research base are identified, the authors conclude that the evidence is sufficiently robust to promote the implementation of policies and practices that promote transparency and openness in collaborative reproduction, thus reflecting the importance of maximising future choices and opportunities for donor-conceived people.
本文报道了一项系统性综述,该综述针对13项关于通过捐赠受孕的儿童及成年人对捐赠受孕的经历和看法的实证研究,这些研究均为英文且经过同行评审。共对19篇符合纳入标准的文章进行了综述。这些文章是通过对1990年至2011年期间四个电子数据库进行文献检索确定的,并由作者本人在该领域的工作知识进行补充。2000年之前没有此类研究报告,自2008年以来超过半数的研究已发表,这表明该领域研究相对新颖。大部分被综述的研究证据涉及在促进匿名和不公开的制度下通过精子捐赠受孕的个体。因此,几乎没有研究涉及通过其他形式的合作生殖受孕的个体,也没有涉及在倡导并实行早期父母披露且捐赠受孕个体可以获取捐赠者及其他基因亲属身份的安排和制度下受孕的个体。这些研究一致报告称,大多数通过捐赠受孕的人有兴趣获取有关其基因和传记遗产的信息——比他们中的大多数人能够获得的信息更多。尽管在研究基础中发现了一些方法上的局限性,但作者得出结论,证据足够有力,足以推动实施促进合作生殖透明度和开放性的政策和做法,从而体现了为捐赠受孕者最大化未来选择和机会的重要性。