Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Seth G S Medical College and K E M Hospital, Mumbai, India.
J Surg Educ. 2012 Sep-Oct;69(5):624-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2012.05.002. Epub 2012 Jun 15.
Structured training on box trainers in laparoscopic skills in the initial years of residency has been used and found to be effective. Although there are studies that confirm immediate improvement after training, there is a lack of well-designed trials addressing the crucial issue of retention of these skills over time. The purpose of this study is to assess improvement in laparoscopic skills of surgical trainees after structured training on box trainers, compared with traditional training (observing and assisting laparoscopic procedures in the operation rooms) immediately and after 5 months.
Forty surgical residents in their first 2 months of residency training were randomized to either structured training on box trainers, in addition to traditional training, or to traditional training alone. Groups were equivalent with regards to demographics, previous operative experience, and baseline skills. Structured training consisted of 4 sessions with 6 tasks on box trainers under supervision and self practice. Task-based objective structured practical examinations (OSPE) were completed before and after each task. At the end of the training, residents were assessed by a blinded faculty member with the global operative assessment of laparoscopic skills (GOALS) rating scale. Residents also completed a satisfaction questionnaire. Focus group discussions were conducted for both groups. The GOALS were repeated for both the groups at the end of 5 months to assess retention of skills.
The mean GOALS score was significantly higher for the structured training group (mean/SD 20.35 + 0.74) compared with the traditional training group (mean/SD 16.35 + 1.75, p < 0.01) at the end of 5 months. The mean global rating scale (GRS) score was significantly higher (Pre 7.55 + 0.99 vs. Post 16.4 + 0.68, p < 0.01) for the structured training group at the end of course. Residents in the structured training group had significantly improved skills immediately after the training and had better retention of skills at the end of five months.
Structured training on box trainers, in addition to traditional training, compared with traditional training alone, leads to better skills and improved confidence of residents. There is significant retention of skills at the end of 5 months. These results provide support for incorporation of structured training with box trainers for laparoscopic skills into surgical training programs.
在住院医师培训的最初几年,已经使用并发现腹腔镜技能的箱式训练器进行结构化培训是有效的。尽管有研究证实培训后立即有改善,但缺乏精心设计的试验来解决这些技能随时间保留的关键问题。本研究的目的是评估在箱式训练器上进行结构化培训后,外科住院医师的腹腔镜技能是否比传统培训(在手术室观察和协助腹腔镜手术)立即和 5 个月后有改善。
40 名住院医师在住院医师培训的头 2 个月内被随机分为结构化训练箱训练组,除传统培训外,还进行结构化训练,或仅进行传统培训。两组在人口统计学、先前手术经验和基线技能方面相当。结构化培训包括 4 次,每次 6 个任务,在监督下和自我练习下进行。在每个任务前后都完成基于任务的客观结构化实践考试(OSPE)。培训结束后,由一名盲法教员使用腹腔镜技能综合评估(GOALS)评分量表对住院医师进行评估。住院医师还完成了一份满意度问卷。对两组进行了焦点小组讨论。在 5 个月结束时,对两组进行了 GOALS 重复评估,以评估技能的保留情况。
结构化训练组的平均 GOALS 评分(均值/标准差 20.35 + 0.74)明显高于传统训练组(均值/标准差 16.35 + 1.75,p < 0.01),5 个月后。课程结束时,结构化训练组的平均总体评价量表(GRS)评分明显更高(前 7.55 + 0.99 与后 16.4 + 0.68,p < 0.01)。结构化训练组的住院医师在培训后立即技能显著提高,5 个月后技能保留更好。
与单独传统培训相比,除传统培训外,在箱式训练器上进行结构化培训可使住院医师的技能提高,信心增强。在 5 个月后,技能保留显著。这些结果为将结构化培训与箱式训练器结合用于腹腔镜技能纳入外科培训计划提供了支持。