Carrat Fabrice, Duval Xavier, Tubach Florence, Mosnier Anne, Van der Werf Sylvie, Tibi Annick, Blanchon Thierry, Leport Catherine, Flahault Antoine, Mentré France
APHP, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Unité de Santé Publique, Paris, France.
Antivir Ther. 2012;17(6):1085-90. doi: 10.3851/IMP2128. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
The effectiveness of neuraminidase inhibitors to reduce transmission when used as treatment in influenza-infected patients remains debated.
In a prespecified analysis of a blinded randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of oseltamivir-zanamivir combination therapy versus oseltamivir and zanamivir monotherapy conducted during the 2008-2009 seasonal influenza epidemic, we compared the rate of secondary illness in household contacts of influenza-positive index patients between arms. Secondary illness was defined as occurrence in contacts of fever plus cough within 7 days from randomization of index patients. Analyses were conducted according to the delay between patients' onset of symptoms and intervention.
A total of 543 household contacts of 267 index patients were included, of which 466 had follow-up assessment. A secondary illness was reported in 58 (12.5%) contacts with no significant difference between arms overall (P=0.07). When the analysis was limited to the 232 contacts of 136 index patients with first treatment intake within 24 h of onset of symptoms, a lower rate of secondary illness was reported in the combination therapy arm (2 of 56 [4%]) than in the oseltamivir arm (14 of 81 [17%]; P=0.014) and the zanamivir arm (14 of 95 [15%]; P=0.031). Multivariate analysis accounting for intra-household correlation confirmed these findings.
Our analysis suggests a greater effectiveness of the combination therapy to reduce transmissibility when given to the index patient within 24 h of onset of symptoms. As the finding was obtained from a subgroup analysis, it should be interpreted with caution.
在流感感染患者中使用神经氨酸酶抑制剂进行治疗时,其降低传播的有效性仍存在争议。
在一项预先设定的分析中,我们对2008 - 2009年季节性流感流行期间进行的一项关于奥司他韦 - 扎那米韦联合疗法与奥司他韦和扎那米韦单药疗法疗效的双盲随机对照试验进行了分析,比较了各治疗组中流感阳性索引患者家庭接触者的继发疾病发生率。继发疾病定义为索引患者随机分组后7天内接触者出现发热加咳嗽。根据患者症状发作与干预之间的时间延迟进行分析。
共纳入267名索引患者的543名家庭接触者,其中466名进行了随访评估。58名(占12.5%)接触者报告发生了继发疾病,各治疗组总体上无显著差异(P = 0.07)。当分析仅限于136名索引患者的232名在症状发作后24小时内首次接受治疗的接触者时,联合治疗组继发疾病发生率(56名中的2名[4%])低于奥司他韦组(81名中的14名[17%];P = 0.014)和扎那米韦组(95名中的14名[15%];P = 0.031)。考虑家庭内相关性的多变量分析证实了这些发现。
我们的分析表明,在症状发作后24小时内给予索引患者联合治疗在降低传播性方面更有效。由于该发现来自亚组分析,应谨慎解读。