Institute for Therapeutic Innovation, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, 6550 Sanger Road, Orlando, FL 32827, United States.
Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY 12208, United States.
Eur J Pharm Sci. 2018 Jan 1;111:443-449. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2017.10.027. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
Drug-resistant influenza is a significant threat to global public health. Until new antiviral agents with novel mechanisms of action become available, there is a pressing need for alternative treatment strategies with available influenza antivirals. Our aims were to evaluate the antiviral activity of two neuraminidase inhibitors (oseltamivir and zanamivir) as combination therapy against H1N1 influenza A viruses, as these agents bind to the neuraminidase active site differently: oseltamivir requires a conformational change for binding whereas zanamivir does not. We performed pharmacodynamic studies in the hollow fiber infection model (HFIM) system with oseltamivir (75mg Q12h, t1/2: 8h) and zanamivir (600mg Q12h, t1/2: 2.5h), given as mono- or combination therapy, against viruses with varying susceptibilities to oseltamivir and zanamivir. Each antiviral suppressed the replication of influenza strains which were resistant to the other neuraminidase inhibitor, showing each drug does not engender cross-resistance to the other compound. Oseltamivir/zanamivir combination therapy was as effective at suppressing oseltamivir- and zanamivir-resistant influenza viruses and the combination regimen inhibited viral replication at a level that was similar to the most effective monotherapy arm. However, combination therapy offered a clear benefit by preventing the emergence and spread of drug-resistant viruses. These findings demonstrate that combination therapy with two agents that target the same viral protein through distinctly different binding interactions is a feasible strategy to combat resistance emergence. This is a novel finding that may be applicable to other viral and non-viral diseases for which different classes of agents do not exist.
耐药性流感对全球公共卫生构成重大威胁。在新的具有新颖作用机制的抗病毒药物问世之前,迫切需要利用现有的流感抗病毒药物制定替代治疗策略。我们的目的是评估两种神经氨酸酶抑制剂(奥司他韦和扎那米韦)作为联合疗法对 H1N1 流感 A 病毒的抗病毒活性,因为这些药物与神经氨酸酶的活性部位结合方式不同:奥司他韦需要构象变化才能结合,而扎那米韦则不需要。我们在中空纤维感染模型(HFIM)系统中进行了药效学研究,奥司他韦(75mg Q12h,t1/2:8h)和扎那米韦(600mg Q12h,t1/2:2.5h)单独或联合应用,针对对奥司他韦和扎那米韦具有不同敏感性的病毒。每种抗病毒药物都能抑制对另一种神经氨酸酶抑制剂耐药的流感株的复制,表明每种药物不会对另一种化合物产生交叉耐药性。奥司他韦/扎那米韦联合治疗对奥司他韦和扎那米韦耐药的流感病毒同样有效,联合治疗方案抑制病毒复制的效果与最有效的单药治疗组相似。然而,联合治疗通过防止耐药病毒的出现和传播提供了明显的益处。这些发现表明,针对同一病毒蛋白的两种药物通过明显不同的结合相互作用进行联合治疗是一种可行的抵抗耐药性出现的策略。这是一个新的发现,可能适用于其他不存在不同类别的药物的病毒和非病毒疾病。