Suppr超能文献

焦点、新奇及其组合:话语信息结构的加工。

Focus, newness and their combination: processing of information structure in discourse.

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42533. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042533. Epub 2012 Aug 17.

Abstract

The relationship between focus and new information has been unclear despite being the subject of several information structure studies. Here, we report an eye-tracking experiment that explored the relationship between them in on-line discourse processing in Chinese reading. Focus was marked by the Chinese focus-particle "shi", which is equivalent to the cleft structure "it was... who..." in English. New information was defined as the target word that was not present in previous contexts. Our results show that, in the target region, focused information was processed more quickly than non-focused information, while new information was processed more slowly than given information. These results reveal differences in processing patterns between focus and newness, and suggest that they are different concepts that relate to different aspects of cognitive processing. In addition, the effect of new/given information occurred in the post-target region for the focus condition, but not for the non-focus condition, suggesting a complex relationship between focus and newness in the discourse integration stage.

摘要

尽管已有多项信息结构研究探讨了焦点与新信息之间的关系,但它们之间的关系仍不明确。在此,我们报告了一项眼动实验,该实验探究了汉语阅读中在线语篇处理中两者之间的关系。焦点由汉语焦点助词“是”标记,与英语中的分裂结构“it was... who...”等效。新信息定义为在前文语境中不存在的目标词。我们的结果表明,在目标区域中,焦点信息的处理速度快于非焦点信息,而新信息的处理速度慢于已知信息。这些结果揭示了焦点和新异性在加工模式上的差异,表明它们是不同的概念,涉及认知加工的不同方面。此外,在焦点条件下,新/已知信息的影响出现在目标区域之后,但在非焦点条件下则没有,这表明在语篇整合阶段焦点和新异性之间存在复杂的关系。

相似文献

1
Focus, newness and their combination: processing of information structure in discourse.
PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42533. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042533. Epub 2012 Aug 17.
2
Anticipating information structure: An event-related potentials study of focus assignment via the it-cleft.
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Nov;134:107203. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107203. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
3
Pragmatic influences on sentence integration: Evidence from eye movements.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Dec;72(12):2742-2751. doi: 10.1177/1747021819859829. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
4
Newness, Givenness and Discourse Updating: Evidence from Eye Movements.
J Mem Lang. 2014 Feb 1;71(1). doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2013.10.003.
6
Electrophysiological indices of brain activity to content and function words in discourse.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2016 Sep;51(5):546-55. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12230. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
7
Similarity between referents constrains the processing of contrastive focus during reading.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Jan;74(1):45-53. doi: 10.1177/1747021820945208. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
8
Linguistic focus affects eye movements during reading.
Mem Cognit. 1997 Sep;25(5):653-60. doi: 10.3758/bf03211306.
9
Eye Movement Evidence for Hierarchy Effects on Memory Representation of Discourses.
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 20;11(1):e0147313. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147313. eCollection 2016.
10
Context updating during sentence comprehension: the effect of aboutness topic.
Brain Lang. 2014 Oct;137:62-76. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2014.08.001. Epub 2014 Aug 24.

引用本文的文献

2
The Interplay between Topic Shift and Focus in the Dynamic Construction of Discourse Representations.
Front Psychol. 2017 Dec 8;8:2184. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02184. eCollection 2017.
3
A review on the cognitive function of information structure during language comprehension.
Cogn Neurodyn. 2014 Oct;8(5):353-61. doi: 10.1007/s11571-014-9305-1. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
4
Newness, Givenness and Discourse Updating: Evidence from Eye Movements.
J Mem Lang. 2014 Feb 1;71(1). doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2013.10.003.

本文引用的文献

1
Abstractionist versus episodic theories of repetition priming and word identification.
Psychon Bull Rev. 1995 Sep;2(3):339-63. doi: 10.3758/BF03210972.
2
Fractionating the word repetition effect with event-related potentials.
J Cogn Neurosci. 1991 Spring;3(2):131-50. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1991.3.2.131.
3
Eye movement guidance in Chinese reading: is there a preferred viewing location?
Vision Res. 2011 May 25;51(10):1146-56. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.03.004. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
4
Task effects on eye movements during reading.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Nov;36(6):1561-6. doi: 10.1037/a0020693.
5
Effects of syntactic prominence on eye movements during reading.
Mem Cognit. 2010 Sep;38(6):740-52. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.6.740.
6
Enhancement and suppression effects resulting from information structuring in sentences.
Mem Cognit. 2009 Sep;37(6):880-8. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.6.880.
7
The influence of only and even on online semantic interpretation.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Aug;16(4):678-83. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.4.678.
8
Semantic illusion depends on information structure: ERP evidence.
Brain Res. 2009 Jul 28;1282:50-6. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.05.069. Epub 2009 Jun 6.
9
Repeated text in unrelated passages: Repetition versus meaning selection effects.
Mem Cognit. 2009 Jul;37(5):556-68. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.5.556.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验