Suppr超能文献

焦点、新奇及其组合:话语信息结构的加工。

Focus, newness and their combination: processing of information structure in discourse.

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42533. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042533. Epub 2012 Aug 17.

Abstract

The relationship between focus and new information has been unclear despite being the subject of several information structure studies. Here, we report an eye-tracking experiment that explored the relationship between them in on-line discourse processing in Chinese reading. Focus was marked by the Chinese focus-particle "shi", which is equivalent to the cleft structure "it was... who..." in English. New information was defined as the target word that was not present in previous contexts. Our results show that, in the target region, focused information was processed more quickly than non-focused information, while new information was processed more slowly than given information. These results reveal differences in processing patterns between focus and newness, and suggest that they are different concepts that relate to different aspects of cognitive processing. In addition, the effect of new/given information occurred in the post-target region for the focus condition, but not for the non-focus condition, suggesting a complex relationship between focus and newness in the discourse integration stage.

摘要

尽管已有多项信息结构研究探讨了焦点与新信息之间的关系,但它们之间的关系仍不明确。在此,我们报告了一项眼动实验,该实验探究了汉语阅读中在线语篇处理中两者之间的关系。焦点由汉语焦点助词“是”标记,与英语中的分裂结构“it was... who...”等效。新信息定义为在前文语境中不存在的目标词。我们的结果表明,在目标区域中,焦点信息的处理速度快于非焦点信息,而新信息的处理速度慢于已知信息。这些结果揭示了焦点和新异性在加工模式上的差异,表明它们是不同的概念,涉及认知加工的不同方面。此外,在焦点条件下,新/已知信息的影响出现在目标区域之后,但在非焦点条件下则没有,这表明在语篇整合阶段焦点和新异性之间存在复杂的关系。

相似文献

3
Pragmatic influences on sentence integration: Evidence from eye movements.语用对句子整合的影响:来自眼动的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Dec;72(12):2742-2751. doi: 10.1177/1747021819859829. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
9
Eye Movement Evidence for Hierarchy Effects on Memory Representation of Discourses.话语记忆表征中层次效应的眼动证据。
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 20;11(1):e0147313. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147313. eCollection 2016.

本文引用的文献

4
Task effects on eye movements during reading.阅读时任务对眼球运动的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Nov;36(6):1561-6. doi: 10.1037/a0020693.
7
The influence of only and even on online semantic interpretation.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Aug;16(4):678-83. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.4.678.
8
Semantic illusion depends on information structure: ERP evidence.语义错觉取决于信息结构:ERP证据。
Brain Res. 2009 Jul 28;1282:50-6. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.05.069. Epub 2009 Jun 6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验