• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

句法突出对阅读时眼球运动的影响。

Effects of syntactic prominence on eye movements during reading.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, College at Brockport, SUNY, Brockport, NY 14420, USA.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2010 Sep;38(6):740-52. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.6.740.

DOI:10.3758/MC.38.6.740
PMID:20852237
Abstract

Three experiments explored whether patterns of eye movements during reading might help explain syntactic prominence effects that are typically observed using reaction time tasks. Participants read sentences in which target words were in syntactically prominent or syntactically less prominent positions. Across all three experiments, using three types of syntactic prominence manipulations, there were fewer fixations and shorter reading times for words in more prominent positions, indicating that enhanced accessibility of syntactically prominent words is not caused by increased processing time. Rather, syntactic prominence appears to facilitate early encoding/lexical access and sentence integration processes while also, as shown previously, increasing activation of concepts in a comprehender's sentence or discourse representation. We propose that enhanced encoding and sentence integration processes can be attributed to an increase in attentional resources for more prominent concepts, and that this increase derives from readers' immediate sensitivity to informational prominence contours that are signaled by syntax.

摘要

三个实验探讨了阅读过程中的眼动模式是否有助于解释通常使用反应时任务观察到的句法突出效应。参与者阅读目标词处于句法突出或句法不那么突出位置的句子。在所有三个实验中,使用三种类型的句法突出性操作,在更突出位置的单词的注视次数更少,阅读时间更短,这表明句法突出的单词的可及性增强不是由于处理时间增加引起的。相反,句法突出似乎促进了早期的编码/词汇访问和句子整合过程,同时也如前所述,增加了理解者句子或语篇表示中的概念的激活。我们提出,增强的编码和句子整合过程可以归因于对更突出概念的注意力资源的增加,而这种增加源自读者对语法信号指示的信息突出轮廓的即时敏感性。

相似文献

1
Effects of syntactic prominence on eye movements during reading.句法突出对阅读时眼球运动的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2010 Sep;38(6):740-52. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.6.740.
2
The time course of semantic and syntactic processing in Chinese sentence comprehension: evidence from eye movements.中文句子理解中语义和句法加工的时间进程:来自眼动的证据。
Mem Cognit. 2009 Dec;37(8):1164-76. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.8.1164.
3
Evidence for simultaneous syntactic processing of multiple words during reading.阅读过程中对多个单词进行同步句法处理的证据。
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 9;12(3):e0173720. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173720. eCollection 2017.
4
The time course of word frequency and case alternation effects on fixation times in reading: evidence for lexical control of eye movements.阅读中词频和格交替效应对注视时间的时间进程:词汇控制眼球运动的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Dec;36(6):1677-83. doi: 10.1037/a0019959.
5
The effect of phonological neighborhood density on eye movements during reading.语音邻域密度对阅读过程中眼动的影响。
Cognition. 2008 May;107(2):685-92. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.020. Epub 2007 Sep 10.
6
Background Speech Effects on Sentence Processing during Reading: An Eye Movement Study.背景:阅读过程中语音对句子加工的影响:一项眼动研究。
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 22;11(3):e0152133. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152133. eCollection 2016.
7
Lexical and message-level sentence context effects on fixation times in reading.词汇和信息层面的句子语境对阅读注视时间的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1994 Jan;20(1):92-103. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.20.1.92.
8
How readers process syntactic input depends on their goals.读者如何处理句法输入取决于他们的目标。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2020 Feb;203:103006. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103006. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
9
Is children's reading "good enough"? Links between online processing and comprehension as children read syntactically ambiguous sentences.儿童的阅读“足够好”吗?儿童阅读句法歧义句时在线加工与理解之间的联系。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016;69(5):855-79. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1011176. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
10
Lexical processing and text integration of function and content words: evidence from priming and eye fixations.功能词和实词的词汇加工与文本整合:来自启动效应和眼动注视的证据。
Mem Cognit. 2000 Oct;28(7):1098-108. doi: 10.3758/bf03211811.

引用本文的文献

1
Linguistic Focus Promotes the Ease of Discourse Integration Processes in Reading Comprehension: Evidence From Event-Related Potentials.语言焦点促进阅读理解中语篇整合过程的流畅性:来自事件相关电位的证据。
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 1;9:2718. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02718. eCollection 2018.
2
Prediction in the Processing of Repair Disfluencies.修复言语不流畅过程中的预测
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Jan;31(1):73-79. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1036089. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
3
Prediction in the processing of repair disfluencies: Evidence from the visual-world paradigm.

本文引用的文献

1
Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search.阅读、场景感知和视觉搜索中的眼动与注意力。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Aug;62(8):1457-506. doi: 10.1080/17470210902816461. Epub 2009 May 14.
2
Focus identification during sentence comprehension: evidence from eye movements.句子理解过程中的焦点识别:来自眼动的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2007 Oct;60(10):1423-45. doi: 10.1080/17470210601100563.
3
Linguistic focus and memory: an eye movement study.语言焦点与记忆:一项眼动研究。
修复言语不流畅加工中的预测:来自视觉世界范式的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Sep;42(9):1400-16. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000256. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
4
Eye Movement Evidence for Hierarchy Effects on Memory Representation of Discourses.话语记忆表征中层次效应的眼动证据。
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 20;11(1):e0147313. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147313. eCollection 2016.
5
Focus takes time: structural effects on reading.专注力需要时间:阅读的结构效应
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Dec;22(6):1733-8. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0843-2.
6
The Role of in Contrasts in and out of Context.关于背景内外对比中的作用。 (原文中“in and out of Context”前面缺少具体内容,这里只能按字面意思翻译,可能不太准确,你可补充完整原文以便更准确翻译。)
Discourse Process. 2013;50(4):249-275. doi: 10.1080/0163853X.2013.778167.
7
The manuscript that we finished: structural separation reduces the cost of complement coercion.我们完成的手稿:结构分离降低了补语强制的成本。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 Mar;41(2):526-40. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000042. Epub 2014 Jul 7.
8
Memory availability and referential access.内存可用性和引用访问。
Lang Cogn Process. 2014 Jan 1;29(1):60-87. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2012.733014.
9
Newness, Givenness and Discourse Updating: Evidence from Eye Movements.新颖性、已知性与话语更新:来自眼动的证据
J Mem Lang. 2014 Feb 1;71(1). doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2013.10.003.
10
What happened (and what didn't): Discourse constraints on encoding of plausible alternatives.发生了什么(以及未发生什么):话语对似是而非替代方案编码的限制。
J Mem Lang. 2013 Oct 1;69(3):196-227. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2013.06.003.
Mem Cognit. 2007 Jan;35(1):73-86. doi: 10.3758/bf03195944.
4
Linguistic focus and good-enough representations: an application of the change-detection paradigm.语言焦点与足够好的表征:变化检测范式的一种应用
Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Oct;11(5):882-8. doi: 10.3758/bf03196716.
5
Readers' sensitivity to linguistic cues in narratives: how salience influences anaphor resolution.读者对叙事中语言线索的敏感度:显著性如何影响指代消解。
Mem Cognit. 2004 Apr;32(3):511-22. doi: 10.3758/bf03195843.
6
Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research.阅读与信息处理中的眼动:二十年研究
Psychol Bull. 1998 Nov;124(3):372-422. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372.
7
Focus as a contextual priming mechanism in reading.作为阅读中一种情境启动机制的焦点。
Mem Cognit. 1998 Nov;26(6):1313-22. doi: 10.3758/bf03201203.
8
Linguistic focus affects eye movements during reading.语言焦点会影响阅读过程中的眼球运动。
Mem Cognit. 1997 Sep;25(5):653-60. doi: 10.3758/bf03211306.
9
The interaction of subjectivization and concept placement in the processing of cleft sentences.分裂句处理中主观化与概念布局的相互作用。
Q J Exp Psychol A. 1982 Nov;34(Pt 4):463-78. doi: 10.1080/14640748208400830.
10
The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model.知识在语篇理解中的作用:一种建构-整合模型。
Psychol Rev. 1988 Apr;95(2):163-82. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.95.2.163.