Benatar Ashley, Clifton Charles
University of Massachusetts Amherst.
J Mem Lang. 2014 Feb 1;71(1). doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2013.10.003.
Three experiments examined the effect of contextual givenness on eye movements in reading, following Schwarzschild's (1999) analysis of givenness and focus-marking in which relations among entities as well as the entities themselves can be given. In each study, a context question was followed by an answer in which a critical word was either given, new, or contrastively (correctively) focused. Target words were read faster when the critical word provided given information than when it provided new information, and faster when it provided new information than when it corrected prior information. Repetition of target words was controlled in two ways: by mentioning a non-given target word in the context in a relation other than that in which it occurred as a target, and by using a synonym or subordinate of a given target to refer to it in the context question. Verbatim repetition was not responsible for the observed effects of givenness and contrastiveness. Besides clarifying previous inconsistent results of the effects of focus and givenness on reading speed, these results indicate that reading speed can be influenced essentially immediately by a reader's discourse representation, and that the extent of the influence is graded, with corrections to a representation having a larger effect than simple additions.
三项实验考察了语境已知性对阅读中眼动的影响,这是遵循施瓦茨施泰因(1999)对已知性和焦点标记的分析,其中实体之间的关系以及实体本身都可以是已知的。在每项研究中,一个语境问题后面跟着一个答案,其中一个关键单词要么是已知的、新出现的,要么是对比性(纠正性)聚焦的。当关键单词提供已知信息时,目标单词的阅读速度比提供新信息时更快,而当它提供新信息时,阅读速度又比纠正先前信息时更快。目标单词的重复通过两种方式进行控制:在语境中以与它作为目标出现时不同的关系提及一个非已知的目标单词,以及在语境问题中使用已知目标单词的同义词或下属词来指代它。逐字重复并不是观察到的已知性和对比性效应的原因。除了澄清之前关于焦点和已知性对阅读速度影响的不一致结果外,这些结果表明,阅读速度基本上可以立即受到读者话语表征的影响,而且影响程度是分级的,对表征的纠正比简单添加产生的影响更大。