Suppr超能文献

最大力量、重复次数和总运动量会受到静态拉伸、弹振式拉伸和本体感受神经肌肉促进拉伸的不同影响。

Maximal strength, number of repetitions, and total volume are differently affected by static-, ballistic-, and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching.

机构信息

Laboratory of Neuromuscular Adaptations to Strength Training, School of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Sep;26(9):2432-7. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31823f2b4d.

Abstract

Stretching exercises have been traditionally incorporated into warm-up routines before training sessions and sport events. However, the effects of stretching on maximal strength and strength endurance performance seem to depend on the type of stretching employed. The objective of this study was to compare the effects of static stretching (SS), ballistic stretching (BS), and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) stretching on maximal strength, number of repetitions at a submaximal load, and total volume (i.e., number of repetitions × external load) in a multiple-set resistance training bout. Twelve strength-trained men (20.4 ± 4.5 years, 67.9 ± 6.3 kg, 173.3 ± 8.5 cm) volunteered to participate in this study. All of the subjects completed 8 experimental sessions. Four experimental sessions were designed to test maximal strength in the leg press (i.e., 1 repetition maximum [1RM]) after each stretching condition (SS, BS, PNF, or no-stretching [NS]). During the other 4 sessions, the number of repetitions performed at 80% 1RM was assessed after each stretching condition. All of the stretching protocols significantly improved the range of motion in the sit-and-reach test when compared with NS. Further, PNF induced greater changes in the sit-and-reach test than BS did (4.7 ± 1.6, 2.9 ± 1.5, and 1.9 ± 1.4 cm for PNF, SS, and BS, respectively). Leg press 1RM values were decreased only after the PNF condition (5.5%, p < 0.001). All the stretching protocols significantly reduced the number of repetitions (SS: 20.8%, p < 0.001; BS: 17.8%, p = 0.01; PNF: 22.7%, p < 0.001) and total volume (SS: 20.4%, p < 0.001; BS: 17.9%, p = 0.01; PNF: 22.4%, p < 0.001) when compared with NS. The results from this study suggest that, to avoid a decrease in both the number of repetitions and total volume, stretching exercises should not be performed before a resistance training session. Additionally, strength-trained individuals may experience reduced maximal dynamic strength after PNF stretching.

摘要

拉伸运动一直以来都被纳入训练前的热身环节中。然而,拉伸运动对最大力量和力量耐力表现的影响似乎取决于所采用的拉伸类型。本研究的目的是比较静态拉伸(SS)、弹振拉伸(BS)和本体感觉神经肌肉促进法(PNF)拉伸对多次重复抗阻训练中的最大力量、次最大负荷重复次数和总容量(即重复次数×外部负荷)的影响。12 名力量训练男性(20.4±4.5 岁,67.9±6.3kg,173.3±8.5cm)自愿参加了这项研究。所有受试者均完成了 8 次实验。在 4 次实验中,在每种拉伸条件(SS、BS、PNF 或不拉伸[NS])后测试腿举的最大力量(即 1 次重复最大值[1RM])。在其他 4 次实验中,在每种拉伸条件后评估在 80%1RM 时的重复次数。与 NS 相比,所有拉伸方案均显著改善了坐立前伸测试中的运动范围。此外,PNF 引起的坐立前伸测试中的变化大于 BS(PNF、SS 和 BS 分别为 4.7±1.6、2.9±1.5 和 1.9±1.4cm)。仅在 PNF 条件后,腿举 1RM 值下降(5.5%,p<0.001)。所有拉伸方案均显著减少重复次数(SS:20.8%,p<0.001;BS:17.8%,p=0.01;PNF:22.7%,p<0.001)和总容量(SS:20.4%,p<0.001;BS:17.9%,p=0.01;PNF:22.4%,p<0.001)与 NS 相比。本研究结果表明,为避免重复次数和总容量减少,在进行抗阻训练前不应进行拉伸运动。此外,PNF 拉伸后,力量训练个体可能会经历最大动态力量下降。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验