Jlala Hatem A, Caljouw Monique A, Bedforth Nigel M, Hardman Jonathan G
University Department of Anesthesia, Queens' Medical Center, Nottingham, UK.
Local Reg Anesth. 2010;3:49-55. doi: 10.2147/lra.s11381. Epub 2010 Jul 28.
This survey aimed to validate the English version of the multidimensional Leiden Perioperative Patient Satisfaction questionnaire (LPPSq) and use it to assess patient satisfaction with perioperative care and the influence of type of anesthesia. One hundred patients having orthopedic surgery under regional and general anesthesia verbally consented to participate. Different aspects of satisfaction were assessed (eg, provision of information, and staff-patient relationship). The reliability estimate of the LPPSq (Cronbach's-α) was good (0.94). Overall, patient satisfaction score was 86.7%, lowest was for information (80.8%) and highest for staff-patient relationships (90.3%). Patients were more satisfied with the provision of information regarding regional anesthesia.
本调查旨在验证多维莱顿围手术期患者满意度问卷(LPPSq)的英文版,并使用该问卷评估患者对围手术期护理的满意度以及麻醉类型的影响。100例接受区域麻醉和全身麻醉的骨科手术患者口头同意参与。评估了满意度的不同方面(例如,信息提供和医患关系)。LPPSq的可靠性估计值(克朗巴赫α系数)良好(0.94)。总体而言,患者满意度得分为86.7%,信息方面得分最低(80.8%),医患关系方面得分最高(90.3%)。患者对区域麻醉相关信息的提供更为满意。